Eastern Bridge Project

Comment Search Mobile

Comment Search

Skip to filters

185 results

Attachment The Proposed Eastern Bridge: Why it Should Not be Built.

  • Eastern Bridge Project
  • Author: CJ Blanchard
  • Reference number: 180
  • Submitted: 2026-09-11 - 4:29 PM
  • This project was put out to bed years ago.  It was determined that any benefit would be outweighed by local residents' concerns, which include: Noise and vibration Pollution local traffic congestion value of homes diminished  kettle Island environmental protection Airport and RCMP's stables' demise This has only been brought to the forefront again by Minister McKinnon.  Now in cabinet, he believes his time for his little pet project has come; for his constituents in Gatineau.  He has no understanding of Manor Park nor the residents' concerns.  This is the most short-sighted project the city has ever witnessed.  My issues are as follows:  -  estimated cost is between $3 billion and $4 billion.  Please consider what that money could do for other traffic issues and infrastructure projects in city. - Kettle Island is a protected environmental piece of land. The federal government gave most of the island to the conservation group as a protected natural gift.The legal agreement bans any form of disturbance on the island.  One  cannot build structures, put in a wooden dock, drain water, or change the soil. - The bridge and road extension will impact 1) The Ottawa Rockcliffe Airport 2) emergency access to the Montfort Hospital 3) the RCMP stables, pastures and musical ride grounds  - building a new highway (nine km) for heavy traffic will disrupt local residents and homes with noise and ground-shaking equipment.   - heavy truck traffic along this nine km highway will create ...

Report

Attachment Our current system is dysfunctional and the Eastern Bridge is necessary

  • Eastern Bridge Project
  • Author: Gregory Laplante
  • Reference number: 179
  • Submitted: 2026-09-11 - 3:45 PM
  • In the context of the federal government forcing all of its employees to work four days a week in the office, almost every single car, bus and truck is forced to use the exact same bridge (Portage) at the exact same times. This results in massive traffic that grinds everything to a halt, clogs major road arteries, and dissuades anyone from wanting to go to downtown Ottawa (notice how this is counter to what the government is trying to achieve?). It further creates massive traffic even far away from Portage, as it forces the majority of cars, buses, and trucks to have to converge on the exact same local roads and/or highway lanes in order to reach the one bridge that can handle more than a pittance of traffic.  This is not a system that is coherent or acceptable.  An Eastern bridge would allow those in the Gatineau sector who are going to downtown Ottawa to head south first to cross the river. This would relieve local circulation by not forcing every single vehicle to converge on the same eastbound roads to the same direction. It would also allow a greater variety of places to get off buses and enter Ottawa, reducing the massive traffic caused by every single bus entering Ottawa to hit the same stops. Another benefit would be that the whole city would not have to come to a grinding halt every single time repairs on Portage Bridge or the Gatineau highway require a lane to be shut down.  While I generally agree with the sentiment that this would not be necessary if the federal government did not do an about-face on the remote work that generally approved employee well-being, increased productivity, and stimulated diverse local economies around the country, we clearly don't live ...

Report

Attachment Opposed to Aviation Parkway/Kettle Island corridor: not a solution to downtown’s truck problem

  • Eastern Bridge Project
  • Author: Amy L
  • Reference number: 175
  • Submitted: 2026-09-11 - 10:35 AM
  • Since plans for an interprovincial bridge crossing at Kettle island were proposed and rejected years ago, the corridor along the Aviation Parkway has become even more developed with more communities, schools, apartment buildings, businesses and service facilities. Now with the revival of this once-rejected plan, it still does not make sense to divert the transport truck problem from downtown just 5 km eastward to another developed area as it will only lead to more traffic congestion, increased pollution (noise, air, light), increased safety risks for pedestrians (including school children), cyclists and motorists who cross the Aviation Parkway on a daily basis, and also the destruction of the parkland and natural habitats along the Aviation Parkway, the Ottawa River and on/around Kettle Island itself. Those supporting the Kettle Island bridge option seem to not be aware that only a fraction of the transport truck traffic will be diverted away from the downtown core (only about 15% of King Edward truck traffic by 2050, as reported in a NCC-commissioned study in 2021). So the proposed bridge will not solve the downtown truck traffic problem, but rather spread the problem around to other populated areas with devastating impacts. No one wants to see any pedestrian fatalities along either corridor.  It seems like the proposed corridor is mostly beneficial for Gatineau commuters making their way into Ottawa and not the other way around. And this comes at a cost to communities, businesses and services (such as the Montfort Hospital) on the Ontario side flanking the corridor (not to mention the impacts on communities and businesses on the ...

Report

Attachment There must be a transportation solution that doesn't ruin/disrupt one of the nicest neighbourhoods in Ottawa

  • Eastern Bridge Project
  • Author: Mark Farfan de los Godos
  • Reference number: 174
  • Submitted: 2026-09-11 - 9:57 AM
  • While the objective of improving transportation options between Ottawa and Gatineau makes good sense, the proposed location of the new bridge is objectionable. The bridge should be located further east, where the disruption to citizens will be less and where easy connections between Route 50 and Ottawa highways can still be made.  The bike and walking trails along the Ottawa river just east of downtown are worth protecting. The lengthy construction period would undoubtedly impact residents' ability to enjoy these trails for years. Additionally, a new bridge, ostensibly constructed to divert truck and other traffic from the downtown core, would re-route noise and pollution into what is currently a beautiful greenspace. This would be a hugely negative environmental change in the long term. Next, the neighbourhood adjacent to the proposed bridge (Manor Park) is an old Ottawa gem with quiet streets, charm, and character. It would be an absolute shame to disrupt it's peaceful streets and introduce a major source of through-traffic just a few hundred meters away. Ottawa, the NCR, the province, and the federal government should be working to preserve vibrant communities and neighbourhoods rather than introducing infrastructure projects that would alter them negatively.  A new bridge should be located somewhere with a smaller impact on residents (i.e. further east, away from population centres that would be impacted). There are already multiple bridges just a few kilometers west of the proposed Eastern Bridge. Since the stated objective of the Eastern Bridge project is to connect highways in Quebec and Ontario, diverting truck traffic from downtown, it makes good sense that this ...

Report

Attachment Un nouveau pont dans l’est : une infrastructure essentielle pour l’avenir de notre région | A New Eastern Bridge: Essential Infrastructure for Our Region’s Future

  • Eastern Bridge Project
  • Author: Conseiller municipal du district du Lac-Beauchamp (Gatineau) / City councillor of Lac-Beauchamp (Gatineau)
  • Reference number: 171
  • Submitted: 2026-09-10 - 10:11 AM
  • À titre de conseiller municipal du district de Lac-Beauchamp, je souhaite exprimer mon appui clair à la réalisation d’un nouveau lien interprovincial dans l’est de Gatineau. Depuis trop longtemps, les infrastructures reliant Gatineau et Ottawa sont principalement concentrées dans les secteurs centraux et dans l’ouest. Cette situation ne correspond plus à la croissance démographique de notre région ni aux besoins des résidents de l’est. Elle contribue à la congestion, allonge les déplacements et limite les possibilités de développement de secteurs comme le nôtre. Un pont dans l’est permettrait de mieux répartir les déplacements entre les différents axes interprovinciaux, d’améliorer la résilience du réseau routier et d’offrir une solution supplémentaire lorsque des travaux, des collisions ou d’autres incidents perturbent les ponts existants. Il contribuerait également à réduire la pression exercée sur les quartiers résidentiels et sur les axes du centre-ville qui accueillent actuellement une part disproportionnée de la circulation interprovinciale, notamment celle des véhicules lourds. Ce projet doit toutefois être conçu comme un véritable lien de mobilité durable. Il devrait prévoir, dès sa conception, une desserte efficace en transport collectif ainsi que des infrastructures sécuritaires et accessibles pour les cyclistes et les piétons. Il faudra également porter une attention rigoureuse à la ...

Report

Attachment Impacts potentiels sur la sécurité et la circulation

  • Eastern Bridge Project
  • Author: Frédéric Bussière
  • Reference number: 170
  • Submitted: 2026-09-10 - 10:06 AM
  • Bien que l'idée d'un nouveau pont ne soit pas en soi mauvaise, j'ai plusieurs réserves quant au trajet choisi du côté de Gatineau. Effectivement, la Montée Paiement est une route qui est déjà très passante et qui présente un dénivelé parmi les plus importants de la Ville afin de se rendre jusqu'à la bretelle d'accès de l'autoroute 50. Considérant que l'un des points principaux de ce projet est d'enlever les camions lourds du centre-ville d'Ottawa, je redoute les effets négatifs de l'augmentation du ce type de véhicule sur la sécurité des personnes empruntant la Montée Paiement ainsi que l'ensemble des routes qui la croise. Je n'ai pas vu de mesures atténuatrices avancées afin de renforcer la sécurité, par exemple, des piétons et des cyclistes empruntant les traverses, ainsi que des mesures advenant un bris mécanique sur un camion lors de sa descente. Effectivement, considérant qu'une intersection se situe au pied de la dite pente, un véhicule lourd qui n'arriverait pas à arrêter pourrait créer un accident majeur mettant en péril la sécurité de nombreuses personnes. Ensuite, au niveau de la fluidité de la circulation, j'ai des doutes que la configuration actuelle de la Montée Paiement puisse accepter une augmentation drastique du nombre de véhicules, particulièrement sur les heures de pointe. Effectivement, entre l'autoroute et le boulevard Maloney, il y a 9 intersections avec lumières de ...

Report

Attachment No to the Eastern Bridge Project!

  • Eastern Bridge Project
  • Author: Payton Godon-Hanson
  • Reference number: 168
  • Submitted: 2026-09-09 - 7:07 PM
  • Any bridge in the Greenbelt would have significant environmental, social, community health, and financial consequences for the neighbouring communities. The proposed bridge locations will increase traffic congestion on the already overburdened 417 and 174 highway routes, resulting in longer commute times for east-end residents. The government’s own traffic studies show that any east-end bridge will not resolve the truck issue downtown. Recently, the political conversation has shifted from a bridge to resolve the truck traffic in downtown Ottawa to improving interprovincial traffic flow. All four municipal councillors of the east end of Ottawa and the Member of Parliament for Orléans, Marie-France Lalonde, have promised to support the Interprovincial Crossing Committee of the Convent Glen – Orléans Wood Community Association (the “Bridge Committee”) in its efforts to stop the construction of a bridge in the Greenbelt.    The much-loved recreational space provided by the eastern part of the Greenbelt will be significantly altered, with a great reduction in the recreational network and environmental landscape frequently used by residents. The eastern part of the Greenbelt will be destroyed, causing environmental and ecological impacts on water, soil, and habitats.  We live in a community that will be affected. We are not ‘rich’ as many people online believe. The commute in this area is already very congested, especially with all the poorly planned out new residential buildings being put up en mass without ...

Report

Attachment Concerns with Corridor 5 proposal

  • Eastern Bridge Project
  • Author: S. Hutt
  • Reference number: 162
  • Submitted: 2026-09-09 - 10:43 AM
  • a { text-decoration: none; color: #464feb; } tr th, tr td { border: 1px solid #e6e6e6; } tr th { background-color: #f5f5f5; } a { text-decoration: none; color: #464feb; } tr th, tr td { border: 1px solid #e6e6e6; } tr th { background-color: #f5f5f5; } Traffic Congestion While I agree that another bridge is needed, the corridor 5 option will displace the downtown Ottawa traffic congestion to mostly residential areas. Adding new road capacity often attracts additional vehicle traffic, creating greater demand and shifting congestion to nearby intersections and connecting roads rather than eliminating it. Residents on both sides of the river will experience increased traffic volumes, longer delays at key junctions, and greater pressure on local streets that were never designed to accommodate high volumes of through traffic. Furthermore, existing traffic management issues in the Montee Paiement area have not been adequately addressed. Current traffic light timing and signal coordination along with placement already contribute to delays, queueing, and driver frustration. Poor accessibility design at several intersections (including Davidson and Nobert) and access points to and off Highway 50 create gridlocks, inefficient traffic flow, and challenges for pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists alike.  Multiple 18 wheelers that average 70 feet in length on this segment of road simply won't fit within the configuration. A new bridge corridor in this location will compound existing congestion problems and reduce the overall effectiveness of the transportation network. Impact on residential neighborhoods The proposed route will cause ...

Report

Attachment Please build it, and do it well

  • Eastern Bridge Project
  • Author: Mélinda Charette
  • Reference number: 158
  • Submitted: 2026-09-08 - 1:41 PM
  • This is a must-have link for the people that live in Gatineau (sector), Buckingham, Masson-Angers. It would stop us from being bottlenecked through Hull into Ottawa every day as a lot of us work in Ottawa. It would relieve pressure in the downtown region in Ottawa and Hull, making it a more pleasant place to go to. There would be a lot less cars and large trucks that are currently causing gridlocks 3 times a day. Which would make it safer and more accessible for people using public transport, pedestrians, and bikes, etc. I live right next to the highway in Gatineau, and still refuse to go to Ottawa in general due to how much traffic and chaos there is, it is overwhelming.  That said, this needs to be done right. We need to ensure that cars are kept metres away from pedestrians and bikes, and that many cyclists can move safely, to accommodate for growing use. Electric bikes and scooters, mobility chairs, skateboards, roller-blades, etc. all need to be taken into account. It may be a good idea to separate the pedestrians from the cyclists and other mobility aid users, for extra safety. It may also be a good idea to make those bike/mobility aid lines extra wide, or have 2 lanes in each direction to accommodate the growing use.  Most importantly, please take into account natural shade from trees, as well as the sun's path throughout the day in summer here. Much of Gatineau and Ottawa is plagued by poor city planning, causing pedestrians and cyclists to be stuck for long stretches without any shaded areas to walk in, or even any shaded public benches or resting areas. This makes travelling using active means very hard on the body, especially during heatwaves, which are becoming more common. ...

Report

Attachment Kettle Island site a poor choice

  • Eastern Bridge Project
  • Author: Lois Wilson
  • Reference number: 157
  • Submitted: 2026-09-08 - 11:36 AM
  • While I recognize the problems with truck traffic through the centre of Ottawa, I fail to see how moving the crossing 9 km down the road through a different residential neighbourhood will solve the problem. Since the previous assessment was done about 15 years ago, the population density has increased, with more condo towers currently being built and more planned for according to the City of Ottawa mandate to build around LRT stations.  The intersection of Ogilvie and Aviation Parkway, and Montreal Rd and Aviation is very busy intersections even now.   On the map, it appears that number of lanes on the Aviation Parkway can be easily increased, if one wants to impinge on more wetlands. The problem then arises at the intersection of Montreal Rd, on the corner of the Montfort Hospital where ambulances, fire trucks and many  pedestrians, including those using mobility devices, compete.  Why a major truck route is planned on the corner of a hospital site makes no sense to me.  Then there is the access to the Aviation and Space museum, Marina , shared pathways, the RCMP stable and River House.  I have to question if  anyone on the Commission has ever walked or driven the route.  The proposed bridge will ruin one of the most beautiful areas of our city, not to mention endangering the lives of those living in the area (much as it does downtown).  As a resident of 905 Beauparc Pvt, this bridge will directly impact my family, and I would be remiss if I did not express my opinion.   Thank you,   Lois Wilson

Report

Attachment Good idea - Bad application

  • Eastern Bridge Project
  • Author: Menad S
  • Reference number: 156
  • Submitted: 2026-09-08 - 10:29 AM
  • I support the initiative to improve regional mobility, but I strongly object to the current proposal. The Aviation Parkway is much more than a roadway; it is an NCC-protected cultural landscape. It is a highly valued urban green space where families run, cycle, and enjoy the natural environment. It also successfully performs its historic, designated purpose: helping thousands of daily commuters bypass heavy highway gridlock. The current plan to widen the parkway and designate it as a major freight route will destroy both vital functions. It replaces a scenic, tranquil public asset with a traffic-heavy corridor. The project's own studies confirm that noise, traffic, and airborne pollutants will rise significantly along these existing roads. This approach fails local citizens and will replace a cherished green space with localized neighborhood congestion and environmental degradation. The OC transpo route that services Montreal road are already frequently late due to traffic and congestion. This will amplify all exiting problems, not solve them. Ultimately, this design does not solve the region's congestion issues; it simply relocates them. Technical studies confirm that the project will introduce substantial traffic, noise, and airborne emissions to areas where they do not currently exist. This project will create a new, permanently congested gridlock zone in our neighborhoods.

Report

Attachment Necessity for east-end bridge

  • Eastern Bridge Project
  • Author: Brian Gendron-Houle
  • Reference number: 153
  • Submitted: 2026-09-07 - 8:13 PM
  • I am a resident of the Buckingham neighbourhood of Gatineau, on the extreme East, and my work brings me to several parts of Ottawa as far out as Kanata but also in the Orleans area. The various bottlenecks generated by each bridge on the Ottawa, Gatineau and Rideau rivers and the segmented make-up of downtown Ottawa and downtown Gatineau are exponential multipliers for commute times. Across my few work sites, the unimpeded commute averages from 38 to 44 minutes, excluding if there is construction work - which is necessary from time to time. The additional time required at rush hour can average between 30 to 75 minutes depending on location, excluding accidents, closures related to events or weather. Using public transit would be of no help, calculated itinerary times averaging from 135 to 200 min, usually with 4 or 5 legs of transportation. This situation is not unfortunate just for me. Many acquaintances who live close to the new proposed bridge site face very similar situations for both car and public transit. The establishment of a new bridge connection east would enable to diffuse much traffic in downtown core, enable new options for inter-city public transit, reduce trucking downtown and mitigate the impacts of downtown events on traffic (BlueFest, Army Run, etc.). In Canada, major infrastructure of the sorts were mainly envisioned and created in the 60's and 70's, and since then hightened public communications have often boosted public opinion and impeded such major projects. This created a major lag in forecasts for future major infrastructure, and Canada is now facing major overlap of significant infrastructure needs. The time to act is now.

Report

Attachment Strong concerns with this project

  • Eastern Bridge Project
  • Author: Jean-Patrick Toussaint
  • Reference number: 148
  • Submitted: 2026-09-06 - 1:10 PM
  • I am writing as a resident of the Cummings/Forbes neighbourhood. Our property and that of our neighbors have no buffer between it and the corridor this Project proposes to widen and convert into a major truck route. I recognize that interprovincial bridge capacity is genuinely constrained and that routing heavy trucks through the downtown core is a legitimate problem. However, I do not think Corridor 5, as currently proposed, has been shown to be the right way to solve it. I am asking that the following points be entered into the public record and substantively addressed before the Project proceeds further. **1. This corridor was studied and abandoned once before, for reasons that deserve a direct answer.** The Aviation Parkway/Kettle Island corridor was recommended in 2009 and again in 2013, and in June 2013 the Government of Ontario formally withdrew its support, after which the NCC terminated the study, following public criticism that the process had not adequately weighed social and environmental impacts on surrounding communities. The current Initial Project Description mentions only that the Project "was dormant until Budget 2019," without explaining why. I recognize that conditions can change over 13 years, and I am not asking the Agency to treat 2013 as dispositive — but I am asking the proponent to state, on the record, what has materially changed in the community-impact analysis since then. **2. The proponent's own evaluation shows this corridor scores worse for human health and social equity than the retained alternative.** Table 12-2 of the Initial Project Description states that Corridor 5 "scored lower on most human health subfactors... because its ...

Report

Date submitted Display filters

Filters

Date modified: