Beaver Dam Mine Project

Comment Search Mobile

Comment Search

Skip to filters

373 results

Attachment Health Canada's conformity and technical review of the Proponent's revised response for CEAA-2-31 Round 2 IR responses

  • Beaver Dam Mine Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Health Canada
  • Reference Number: 323
  • Submitted: 2022-01-24
  • Project Phase: N/A
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • Please see the attached submission.
  • Attachment Included
  • Environmental Health Program Regulatory Operations and Enforcement Branch Health Canada 1505 Barrington Street Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J EY6 January 24, 2022 Kathryn MacCarthy Impact Assessment Agency of Canada 200-1801 Hollis Street Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3N4 Sent by email to: Kathryn.MacCarthy@iaac-aeic.gc.ca Subject: Health Canada’s conformity and technical review of the Proponent’s revised response for CEAA-2-31 in the revised Round II (Part 1 and Part 2) information request responses and revised Environmental Impact Statement for the Beaver Dam Mine Project Dear Kathryn MacCarthy: Thank you for your email dated December 14, 2021 requesting Health Canada’s conformity and technical review of the Proponent’s revised response for CEAA-2-31 in the revised Round II (Part 1 and Part 2) information request responses and revised Environmental Impact Statement for the Beaver Dam Mine Project. For this project, Health Canada is participating ...
  • Attachment Included
  • 1 ANNEX 1: Information requests directed to the proponent for revised CEAA-2-31 ID Project Effects Link to CEAA 2012 Reference to EIS guidelines Reference to EIS Context and Rationale Specific Question/ Request for Information Air HC-A-14 5(1)(c)(i) Aboriginal Peoples Health/ socio-economic conditions 5(1)(c)(iii) Current Use of Lands and Resources for traditional purposes Section 6.2.1 Changes to the atmospheric environment Information Request Responses Round II Package Revised CEAA -2-31 Pg. 73-171 PDF The air quality isopleths do not show all data nor the baseline + project scenario. Ranges shown on the air quality isopleths do not include the lowest values that were modelled. For example, the NO2 24-hour contours in Figure CEAA 2-31-16A (Pg. 116 PDF) do not show values below 1 µg/m3. This can give the false impression that the project is not contributing contaminants of potential concern at any level, while in fact the ...

Report
Date modified: