Cedar LNG Project

Comment Search Mobile

Comment Search

Report Comment

Are you sure you want to report this comment for review?
Skip to filters
Sort By: Best Match Most Recent Submitted By

47 results

Attachment Cedar LNG Project

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Mike Fletcher
  • Reference Number: 38
  • Submitted: 2019-11-27 - 6:11 AM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • Dear Reviewers,  Given that: 1. Canada has entered a climate emergency as declared by are parliament 2. The UN has stated that global emissions must drop 7.6% per annum to avoid catastrophic climate change 3. A previous study underestimateed the impacts of an LNG development on wild salmon 4. Parts of the arctic are melting 70 years sooner than scienists earlier predicted 5. Fracking, which is the source of LNG is responsible for earthquakes, methane release and water contamination and 6. Renewables are now beating natural gas economically as a fuel for electricity generation I'm wondering why you are even considering this proposal. This madness must stop. Sincerely, Mike Fletcher.

Report

Attachment Cedar LNG - Summary of Issues Kitselas Follow-up Comments

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Kitselas First Nation
  • Reference Number: 39
  • Submitted: 2019-11-08
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Attached are a couple of commented we wanted to bring to your attention with regards to Cedar’s initial PD. We meant to send these along with our letter regarding substitution and summary of issues but it fell through the cracks. We are hoping these could be addressed in Cedar’s Detailed Project Description. Please give me a call if you have any questions or concerns.   Happy Friday!     Kind regards,   Sachi   Sachiko Ouchi T: 250-615-4066 (not working!) 2225 Gitaus Road Project Assessment Officer C: 250-641-7618 Terrace, B.C. V8G 0A9 Kitselas ...
  • Attachment Included
  • Comment Number Reviewer Reviewer Affiliation Document Comment/Concern Request 1 Chris Apps Kitselas Lands and Resources Department Cedar LNG Project Description The bleow comment pertains to the project decription provided by Cedar LNG: Kitselas information is identical to Kitsumkalum information. Please note that athought there are historical and cultural ties between the two communities, these are separate Nations Please include correct information for Kitsumkalum First Nation 2 Chris Apps Kitselas Lands and Resources Department Cedar LNG Project Description The bleow comment pertains to the project decription provided by Cedar LNG: Description of IR1 and IR6 location is incorrect. IR1 is located in Kitselas Canyon and IR6 is located outside of Terrace Please revise with corrent information 3 Chris Apps Kitselas Lands and Resources Department Cedar LNG Project Description The bleow comment pertains to the ...
Report

Attachment Request for Comments on the Potential Federal Environmental Assessment of the Proposed Cedar LNG Project in Kitimat, BC

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Metlakatla Stewardship Society
  • Reference Number: 32
  • Submitted: 2019-10-29 - 3:31 PM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Please see the attached submission.
  • Attachment Included
  • Phone: (250) 628-3315 Fax: (250) 628-9259 P.O. Box 224 Prince Rupert, BC V8J 3P6 ...

Attachment Haisla Membership Opportunities

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Steve Wilson
  • Reference Number: 22
  • Submitted: 2019-10-22 - 3:31 AM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • My name is Steven Wilson and I am Haisla. I was the first to sign an LNG agreement with Galveston LNG in 2005. We had an agreement that included a 15% equity stake in the terminal worth $180,000,000. The tolling at the terminal was set at 22.5% Return on Equity. The vision was to have a share and a say how the project was developed. I acquired 30% equity in the PTP Pipeline and helped with the PTP FNLP and accompanying ASETS. All of that was flushed down the toilet because the leadership listened to the consultants and lawyers who advised them no one would finance the equity. The ROE would generate $40,500,000/year. A return on investment at 6% compounded interest on the ROE would be valued at $1.2 Billion in year 23 of a 50 Year cycle. Of course, that assumes that the EBITA would all go to the investment instead of paying down the debt. But the Capital Cost Allowance would more than make-up for the cost of debt repayment.  On top of the value we ...

Report

Attachment Request for Comments on the Potential Federal Assessment of the Proposed Cedar LNG Project in Kitimat, British Columbia

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Gitxaala Nation
  • Reference Number: 34
  • Submitted: 2019-10-22
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Please see the attached submission.
  • Attachment Included
  • 1 October 22, 2019 Meghan Gilgunn Regional Director, Pacific and Yukon Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Emailed to megan.gilgun@canada.ca Re: Request for Comments on the Potential Federal Assessment of the Proposed Cedar LNG Project in Kitimat, British Columbia Gitxaała Nation, through Gitxaała Environmental Monitoring, has conducted a preliminary review of the of the Project Description for the Cedar LNG Project, and the information contained in your letter to Chief Councillor Linda Innes, dated September 19th, 2019. It is our understanding that this proposed project includes the following components: • The development, construction and operation of a floating liquified natural gas facility and marine export terminal in Kitimat, BC • Production of 3-4 million tons of LNG per year • Include storage capacity for up to 250 000 cubic metres of LNG • 25 year lifespan • Marine shipping is ...
Report

Attachment 6 Critical Things to Consider

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Melyssa Desilles
  • Reference Number: 21
  • Submitted: 2019-10-21 - 1:23 AM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • 1) Current regulations require both; the Proponent expects both: Under current assessment legislation, this project meets the criteria for assessment by both IAAC and its provincial counterpart, the BC Environmental Assessment Authority. As the IAAC legislation is new, we think it unwise to miss this opportunity to test its validity and public acceptance. We note that the proponent acknowledges that the project qualifies for a IAAC assessment. On P. 1 of the project description, the Proponent notes that: “It is expected that the Project will require an environmental assessment (“EA”) under both the British Columbia Environmental Assessment Act (BIAAC) and the federal Impact Assessment Act (IAA) as the ...

Report

Attachment Cedar LNG Project

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Kitselas First Nation
  • Reference Number: 35
  • Submitted: 2019-10-21
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Please see the attached submission.
  • Attachment Included
  • Kitselas Lands and Resources Department 2225 Gitaus Road, Terrace, BC V8G 0A9 P: (778) 634-3517  www.kitselas.com October 21, 2019 Impact Assessment Agency of Canada Pacific and Yukon Region 701 West Georgia Street Suite 410 Vancouver BC V7Y 1C6 ATTN: Meghan Gilgunn RE: Cedar LNG Project Thank you for your letter regarding the Cedar LNG Project seeking feedback on potential impacts of the project as well as on the BC EAO’s request for a substituted process. It is our understanding that this project is comprised of the following main components: • Process and liquefy 3-4 MT of LNG per year • Store capacity of 250,00 m3 • 25 year life span • 40-50 shipments of LNG per year Kitselas understands that the review of this project will be conducted under the new Impact Assessment Act (the Act). Kitselas is also aware that the proposed project under British Columbia’s Environmental Assessment Act will also take place under the previous Act, as the ...
Report

Attachment Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment - BC chapter

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Larry Barzelai
  • Reference Number: 20
  • Submitted: 2019-10-20 - 10:19 PM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • As physicians dealing with the interaction between the environment and peoples’ health, we are seriously concerned about the proposed Cedar LNG project.  First, we think that the assessment should have a federal review rather than a provincial review. We feel that a project of this size requires the more comprehensive federal review, especially since the federal review is more likely to consider human health issues. We believe any review that does not take human health impacts into consideration is deeply flawed. Secondly, we are very concerned about existing health patterns affecting people in the Peace Region, the region from which most of the fracked gas will originate. Recent studies show higher incidences of respiratory disease, cancers and ill-effects on newborn babies in that region of BC, compared to averages for the province, strongly suggesting a connection to the fracking industry there. Most important, we are concerned about the ...

Report

Attachment Requirement for a Federal (IAAC) review of Cedar LNG

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Eoin Finn
  • Reference Number: 19
  • Submitted: 2019-10-20 - 7:28 PM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • On behalf of the My Sea to Sky (MS2S), a non-governmental organization in Howe Sound, BC, I am writing to support the requirement that the Cedar LNG project undergo both a Federal/ IAAC and a BC/ BIAAC environmental review and that any request by the BC Government for a substituted assessment be denied. The attached document sets out the major reasons for our request.
  • Attachment Included
  • My Sea to Sky | PO Box 2668, Squamish BC, V8B 0B8 | www.myseatosky.org October 20, 2019 Cedar LNG Project Impact Assessment Agency Canada 410-701 West Georgia Street Vancouver, British Columbia V7Y 1C6 Submitted via web to: https://www.canada.ca/en/impact-assessment-agency/news/2019/09/cedar-lng- project--public-comments-invited.html . Original signed hardcopy hand-delivered. Dear Sir/Madam, Re: Requirement for a Federal (IAAC) review of Cedar LNG On behalf of the My Sea to Sky (MS2S), a non-governmental organization in Howe Sound, BC, I am writing to support the requirement that the Cedar LNG project undergo both a Federal/ IAAC and a BC/ BIAAC environmental review and that any request by the BC Government for a substituted assessment be denied. Our reasons include: • Current regulations require both; the Proponent expects both: Under current assessment legislation, this project meets the criteria for assessment by both IAAC and its ...
Report

Attachment Cedar LNG consideration

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Lucy McRae
  • Reference Number: 18
  • Submitted: 2019-10-20 - 4:32 AM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • I am satisfied that this project can be done in a safe manner with a small footprint. I have read through the project description and cannot see anywhere that there is menton of Condensate. I am fairly certain that Condensate will be a byproduct and that it is fairly volatile. The access road leading to the Marine facility is a very poor road that has areas that are single lane as it is susceptible to rock falls etc. there would be no possibility of a railway system installation, between the road and the hillside there is no right of way. I have not seen any maps that show the pipeline right of way and if there was a pipeline built to deal with the condensate what would be the end location of that pipeline. With three other projects in a very small area producing Condensate as a byproduct I do have concerns on hw this will be dealt with cumulatively. I look forward to seeing more information as the process moves along. Lucy McRae

Report
Other

Attachment Cedar LNG Submission - Air Quality Concerns

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Lis Stannus
  • Reference Number: 17
  • Submitted: 2019-10-20 - 12:00 AM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • To: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency     10/19/2019 The Cedar LNG project is now the third LNG project under proposition in the Kitimat Valley and these projects are in addition to Rio Tinto’s existing aluminum smelting plant.  Local residents are already concerned about local air quality due to Rio Tinto’s substantial sulphur dioxide emissions.  LNG Canada, which is in construction phase, is also expected to contribute sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide emissions to the existing Rio Tinto emissions The public needs more information on the impacts of industry pollution in the Kitimat Terrace airshed.  The only study that examined existing and potential industry emissions (Kitimat Airshed Study 2014) presented pollutants (nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide) in isolation without consideration of the interaction between pollutants.  The compound impact of pollution over time from Rio Tinto’s ...

Report

Attachment Potential federal impact assessment of the proposed Cedar LNG Project

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Métis Nation British Columbia
  • Reference Number: 36
  • Submitted: 2019-10-18
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Please see the attached submission.
  • Attachment Included
  • __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Métis Nation British Columbia (MNBC) represents nearly 90,000 self-identified Métis people in BC. To date, 19,000 Métis Citizens are provincially registered with MNBC. The Métis National Council and the Provincial Government of British Columbia, as well as the Federal Government of Canada, recognize Métis Nation British Columbia as the Governing Nation for Métis in BC. Unit# 107–5668, 192nd Street Surrey, BC, V3S 2V7 Tel: 604.557.5851 Fax: 604.557.2024 TF: 1.800.940.1150 www.mnbc.ca October 18, 2019 Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 410 – 701 West Georgia Street Vancouver, BC V7Y 1C6 By Email Re: Potential federal impact assessment of the proposed Cedar LNG Project Métis Nation British Columbia (MNBC) represents nearly 90,000 self-identified Métis people in British Columbia. Of those, over 19,500 are ...
Report

Attachment Request for Substitution of Environmental Assessment Process

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of District of Kitimat
  • Reference Number: 33
  • Submitted: 2019-10-18
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Dear Impact Assessment Agency of Canada Team: We created an account to submit comment for the environmental assessment substitution of the Cedar LNG project, but have not received an email approving the account to submit. Therefore, to ensure our comment is received prior to the October 20, 2019 submission deadline, we are sending you our comments via this email. Please see District of Kitimat submission attached to this email. <contact information removed>. Thank you very much for the opportunity to comment on this project. Regards, <contact information removed> Economic Development Dept District of Kitimat
  • Attachment Included
  • <Original signed by> <contact information removed>

Report

Attachment Cedar LNG Liquefaction and Export Terminal

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of The North Matters
  • Reference Number: 37
  • Submitted: 2019-10-18
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Please see the attached submission.
  • Attachment Included
  • CEDAR LNG #THENORTHMATTERS CEAA SUBMISSION PAGE # 1 Cedar LNG Liquefaction and Export Terminal ABOUT THE NORTH MATTERS Under the registered name The North Matters, community leaders in the North Coast, Skeena, Cariboo- Chilcotin, Peace River, Northern Rockies and Bulkley Valley Regions have joined forces with citizen groups in the natural gas producing regions of B.C. to highlight benefits of resource development. Our Mission: Building strength in northern communities by aligning and creating opportunities for its residents PAGE # 2 CARING COMMUNITIES • Protecting the natural environment is a primary value of the people of rural resource communities; • Many rural residents work in natural resource industries; • The North Matters advocates for balanced decision making that objectively weighs opportunity in the context of social needs, environmental values, economic return and cultural conservancy. PAGE # 3 • There are many single-interest organizations ...
Report

Attachment Federal Authority Advice Record

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Service Canada
  • Reference Number: 29
  • Submitted: 2019-10-17
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Please see the attached submission.
  • Attachment Included
  • ATTACHMENT: September 19, 2019 Federal Authority Advice Record form Response due by October 9, 2019 Cedar LNG Project – Cedar LNG Export Development Ltd. Agency File: 005734 Department/Agency Service Canada – W-T Region Lead IA Contact Assistant Deputy Minister Office Senior Advisor, Sheila Brasnett Full Address 15th Floor, 300 West Georgia St Vancouver, BC V6B 6G3 Email Sheila.brasnett@servicecanada.gc.ca Telephone 250-979-2453 Alternate Departmental Contact Janet Walsh, Program Delivery Branch Janet.walsh@servicecanada.gc.ca Please find consolidated responses from the W-T Region Business Lines including Strategic Services Branch (SSB), Program Delivery Branch (PDB) and Citizen Services Branch (CSB) as a key business line working directly with communities. POB and PDB intend to align future efforts/project response to ensure a coordinated and collaborative National/Regional approach. Responses below for this early input are reflective of this ...
Report

Attachment Wilderness Committee submission on Cedar LNG project

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Peter McCartney
  • Reference Number: 15
  • Submitted: 2019-10-16 - 6:44 PM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Please see attached Wilderness Committee submission on the Cedar LNG project.
  • Attachment Included
  • Wilderness Committee submission on Cedar LNG project Prepared by: Peter McCartney, Climate Campaigner and Charlotte Dawe, Conservation and Policy Campaigner. I’m writing on behalf of the Wilderness Committee’s 60,000 supporters across Canada with regards to the Impact Assessment for Cedar LNG in Kitimat, B.C. Wilderness Committee has significant concerns with this project, in particular its related carbon emissions, cumulative impacts from fracking operations in the northeastern part of the province and its impacts on the endangered marbled murrelet. Cedar LNG is one of several proposed liquefied natural gas facilities in the province that make it significantly more difficult for the province to meet its targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Under CleanBC, the government committed to a 40 per cent reduction below 2007 levels of carbon dioxide equivalent by 2030. Current climate initiatives only amount to 75 per cent of this goal, without even factoring in a ...
Report
Climate change Human Health and Well-Being Species at Risk Surface Water Quantity Wildlife / Habitat

Attachment Federal Authority Advice Record

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Public Safety Canada
  • Reference Number: 28
  • Submitted: 2019-10-13
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Please see the attached submission.
  • Attachment Included
  • ATTACHMENT: September 19, 2019 Federal Authority Advice Record form Response due by October 9, 2019 Cedar LNG Project – Cedar LNG Export Development Ltd. Agency File: 005734 Department/Agency Public Safety Canada/Pacific Regional Office (PS PRO) Lead IA Contact Andrew Hannan Full Address 607 – 3292 Production Way, Burnaby, BC V5A 4R4 Email Andrew.hannan@canada.ca Telephone 604-666-1199 Alternate Departmental Contact Sue Olsen, 604-666-5705, sue.olsen@canada.ca 1. Is it probable that your department or agency may be required to exercise a power or perform a duty or function related to the Project to enable it to proceed? No. 2. Is your department or agency in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge that may be relevant to the conduct of an impact assessment of the Project? No. 3. Has your department or agency considered the Project; exercised a power or performed a duty or function under any Act of ...
Report

Attachment Federal Authority Advice Record

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Women and Gender Equality Canada
  • Reference Number: 42
  • Submitted: 2019-10-11
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Please see attachment.
  • Attachment Included
  • <Original signed by> PART A – Summary of Issues – Cedar LNG Project Following a review of the Proponent’s Project Description, the following are WAGE’s key suggested areas/issues for the proponent to consider: Current situation and gender relevance The initial Project Description and project consultations should serve to better understand the purpose of the proposed project and show how it connects with gender equality and broader inclusion goals. Ideally gender equality and inclusion issues should be found in all sections of the report rather than mentioned only in a specific section on gender. Having said that, the proponent may wish to include a specific section in the project description to highlight the relevancy between liquefied natural gas facilities and gender equality. In addition to the gender relevancy, the project description should provide a detailed overview of the target group(s) and local context in order to clearly identify the segments of ...
Report

Attachment Federal Authority Advice Record

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Transport Canada
  • Reference Number: 30
  • Submitted: 2019-10-10
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Please see the attached submission.
  • Attachment Included
  • RDIMS 15764663 ATTACHMENT: September 19, 2019 Federal Authority Advice Record form Response due by October 9, 2019 Cedar LNG Project – Cedar LNG Export Development Ltd. Agency File: 005734 Department/Agency Transport Canada Lead IA Contact Suzanne L’Heureux Full Address TC Programs, Environmental Services, 800 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2J8 Email Suzanne.lheureux@tc.gc.ca Telephone 604-836-9371 Alternate Departmental Contact Joanne Kwok (604-315-3167) 1. Is it probable that your department or agency may be required to exercise a power or perform a duty or function related to the Project to enable it to proceed? If yes, specify the Act of Parliament and that power, duty or function. Yes. 1) Any on water works will require an Approval under the Canadian Navigable Waters Act. Under the Canadian Navigable Waters Act (CNWA), Transport Canada issues approvals for (a) a designated major work that may interfere with ...
Report

Attachment Federal Authority Advice Record

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Natural Resources Canada
  • Reference Number: 27
  • Submitted: 2019-10-09
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Please see the attached submission.
  • Attachment Included
  • October 9, 2019 Nicola Cook Project Manager, Pacific and Yukon Region Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency ceaa.cedarlng-gnlcedar.acee@canada.ca Re: Federal Authority Advice Record for the proposed Cedar LNG Project Please see attached for Natural Resources Canada’s (NRCan) response to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency’s September 19, 2019 request to review the Initial Project Description for the Cedar LNG Project and to complete the associated Federal Authority Advice Record (FAAR). NRCan is submitting this response in accordance with subsection 13(1) of the Impact Assessment Act. If you have any questions, please contact me by email at jessica.coulson@canada.ca, or by phone at 613-295-6289 Thank you, Jessica Coulson Team Leader Office of the Chief Scientist <Original signed by> Federal Authority Advice Record form Response due by October 9, 2019 Cedar LNG Project – Cedar LNG ...
Report

Attachment First Nation project = First Nation benefits

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Dale Lunan
  • Reference Number: 14
  • Submitted: 2019-09-25 - 1:29 PM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Cedar LNG is being developed by the Haisla First Nation of Kitamaat Village - a location inhabited by the Haisla for the past 9,000 years or more. It is located on Haisla traditional territory and is well-removed from salmon spawning grounds. And as a project of a First Nation, consultation is implied. Haisla are building a better future, and this project will contribute to that secure future.

Report

Attachment Federal Authority Advice Record

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada
  • Reference Number: 25
  • Submitted: 2019-09-24
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Please see the attached submission.
  • Attachment Included
  • ATTACHMENT: September 19, 2019 Federal Authority Advice Record form Response due by October 9, 2019 Cedar LNG Project – Cedar LNG Export Development Ltd. Agency File: 005734 Department/Agency Fisheries and Oceans Canada Lead IA Contact Tessa Richardson Full Address 401 Burrard Street, Vancouver BC V6C 3S4 Email Tessa.Richardson@dfo-mpo.gc.ca Telephone (604) 362-4645 Alternate Departmental Contact Stephanie Russo Stephanie.Russo@dfo-mpo.gc.ca (604) 666-7066 1. Is it probable that your department or agency may be required to exercise a power or perform a duty or function related to the Project to enable it to proceed? If yes, specify the Act of Parliament and that power, duty or function. Authorization under Section 34.4(2)(b) and 35(2)(b) of the Fisheries Act may be required for any works, undertakings or activities that would result in death of fish or harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat. The project ...
Report

Attachment Stay out of sensitive salmon habitat.

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Leanna Sturley
  • Reference Number: 13
  • Submitted: 2019-09-23 - 1:19 PM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • I am writing as a landowner, farmer in training and citizen with an engineering background. I am in opposition to this Cedar LNG Project in Kitimat. We do not need this project or the LNG capacity. We need to preserve critical salmon habitat and stop maintaining the status quo for rampant industrial activity. We only need to look to LNG projects in Siberia and havoc wreaked upon once thriving salmon populations. Why do we care about salmon populations? Because they are an integral part of the riparian and forest ecosystems on which sustainable forestry and water use are built. Salmon are beautiful creatures, but we can take an economist lens and reduce them to potential tourism dollars, but more importantly, nitrogen packets. These packets of nitrogen feed out forests by their behaviour/life cycle in swimming up river to spawn and die. Their bodies are food for a wide range of animals, who pick up their meal at the river and carry it some distance into the ...

Report
Fish and Fish Habitat General opposition to project Indigenous Consultation Method Surface Water Quantity Tourism Visual Aesthetics

Attachment Federal Authority Advice Record

  • Cedar LNG Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Environment and Climate Change Canada
  • Reference Number: 24
  • Submitted: 2019-09-19
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Please see the attached submission.
  • Attachment Included
  • ATTACHMENT: September 19, 2019 Federal Authority Advice Record form Response due by October 9, 2019 Cedar LNG Project – Cedar LNG Export Development Ltd. Agency File: 005734 Department/Agency Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) Lead IA Contact Taylor Groenewoud, Environmental Assessment Coordinator Full Address 201-401 Burrard Street Vancouver, BC V6C 3S4 Email Taylor.Groenewoud@canada.ca Telephone 604-666-8342 Alternate Departmental Contact Jennifer Huxter, Senior Environmental Assessment Scientist Jennifer.Huxter@canada.ca 1. Is it probable that your department or agency may be required to exercise a power or perform a duty or function related to the Project to enable it to proceed? If yes, specify the Act of Parliament and that power, duty or function. The Initial Project Description states that “Dredging (…) is not expected to be required at this time, therefore disposal at sea is not being proposed” (page 23). The Summary of ...
Report
Report a problem on this page
Date modified: