Cedar LNG Project

Comment Search Mobile

Comment Search

Skip to filters

47 results

Attachment Administrator on behalf of Kitselas First Nation

2019-11-8 0:00
  • Reference Number 39
  • Commented During Project Phase: Planning
  • Commented On Participation Notice: Public Notice - Public Comments Invited on a Summary and Request for Substitution
  • Cedar LNG - Summary of Issues Kitselas Follow-up Comments
  • Attached are a couple of commented we wanted to bring to your attention with regards to Cedar’s initial PD. We meant to send these along with our letter regarding substitution and summary of issues but it fell through the cracks. We are hoping these could be addressed in Cedar’s Detailed Project Description. Please give me a call if you have any questions or concerns.   Happy Friday!     Kind regards,   Sachi   Sachiko Ouchi T: 250-615-4066 (not working!) 2225 Gitaus Road Project Assessment Officer C: 250-641-7618 Terrace, B.C. V8G 0A9 Kitselas ...
  • Attachment Included
  • Comment Number Reviewer Reviewer Affiliation Document Comment/Concern Request 1 Chris Apps Kitselas Lands and Resources Department Cedar LNG Project Description The bleow comment pertains to the project decription provided by Cedar LNG: Kitselas information is identical to Kitsumkalum information. Please note that athought there are historical and cultural ties between the two communities, these are separate Nations Please include correct information for Kitsumkalum First Nation 2 Chris Apps Kitselas Lands and Resources Department Cedar LNG Project Description The bleow comment pertains to the project decription provided by Cedar LNG: Description of IR1 and IR6 location is incorrect. IR1 is located in Kitselas Canyon and IR6 is located outside of Terrace Please revise with corrent information 3 Chris Apps Kitselas Lands and Resources Department Cedar LNG Project Description The bleow comment pertains to the ...

Report

Attachment Eoin Finn

2019-10-20 19:28
  • Reference Number 19
  • Commented During Project Phase: Planning
  • Requirement for a Federal (IAAC) review of Cedar LNG
  • On behalf of the My Sea to Sky (MS2S), a non-governmental organization in Howe Sound, BC, I am writing to support the requirement that the Cedar LNG project undergo both a Federal/ IAAC and a BC/ BIAAC environmental review and that any request by the BC Government for a substituted assessment be denied. The attached document sets out the major reasons for our request.
  • Attachment Included
  • My Sea to Sky | PO Box 2668, Squamish BC, V8B 0B8 | www.myseatosky.org October 20, 2019 Cedar LNG Project Impact Assessment Agency Canada 410-701 West Georgia Street Vancouver, British Columbia V7Y 1C6 Submitted via web to: https://www.canada.ca/en/impact-assessment-agency/news/2019/09/cedar-lng- project--public-comments-invited.html . Original signed hardcopy hand-delivered. Dear Sir/Madam, Re: Requirement for a Federal (IAAC) review of Cedar LNG On behalf of the My Sea to Sky (MS2S), a non-governmental organization in Howe Sound, BC, I am writing to support the requirement that the Cedar LNG project undergo both a Federal/ IAAC and a BC/ BIAAC environmental review and that any request by the BC Government for a substituted assessment be denied. Our reasons include: • Current regulations require both; the Proponent expects both: Under current assessment legislation, this project meets the criteria for assessment by both IAAC and its ...

Report
Date modified: