About the results

Information provided by external sources may not be subject to the Official Languages Act and is made available in the language(s) provided. This may result in content being displayed in a language different than that of the web page display.

The result count may differ from the number of unique comments. Similar comments by various authors may be grouped as a single comment; while each comment and attachment count as distinct results. Where applicable, please click on the alternate formats link to view additional versions available.

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project

Comment Search Mobile

Sort by: Best match Most recent Submitted by

272 results

Attachment Objections to Proposed Tantramar (Centre Village) NB Gas Plant

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Margo Sheppard
Reference number: 250
Submitted: 2025-09-07 - 3:20 PM
Project phase: Planning
September 7, 2025 ...

Attachment Opposition to Centre Village project

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Treena MacTavish
Reference number: 246
Submitted: 2025-08-20 - 11:23 PM
Project phase: Planning
I am strongly opposed to New Brunswick Power's proposal to build a natural gas power plant on the Chignecto Isthmus. This region is environmentally sensitive, is of historical and agricultural significance and is home to species at risk. The Chignecto isthmus is also a critical wildlife corridor formoose and an important stopover for migratory birds. With rising sea levels due to climate change, the Chignecto Isthmus has been projected to be under water in less than 30 years. For all of the above reasons, the Centre Village proposal should not be approved. A natural gas power plant and diesel storage here would be an environmental disaster. I understand that New Brunswick Power needs to increase their energy capacity and that the federal government would like to have oil and gas pipelines stretching across Canada, however Canada should be ended our reliance on fossil fuels and focussing on green power and small nuclear reactors. If the New Brunswick and federal governments are going to insist on building a new gas power plant in New Brunswick, then it absolutely should not be situated at the proposed location. The Chignecto Isthmus is a critical corridor between New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. There are transmission lines elsewhere in the province that a new power plant could be built near without endangering the wetland, farmland, and critical wildlife habitat of the isthmus. Separate from my comments above, I feel that area residents' concerns are valid over the short notice from New Brunswick Power about the proposed facility, the contract with a US company that has lawsuits over deficient work (such as Beumer Corp. v. ...

Attachment Center Village Gas power plant

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Phyllis Wheaton
Reference number: 245
Submitted: 2025-08-20 - 6:14 PM
Project phase: Planning
WHY are you lying about Indigenous being a part of this USA project! your lies were found at Q& A in Sackville. They are NOT! Lie #1. Lies, you say you went to people who live there, YOU DID NOT! not one person stood up said yeah they did. Lie #2 Neighbours talk to Neighbors, WE SPEak to each other. we Care about each other that's why we are speaking up to stop this Gas plant from going in the Chignecto Isthmus! Shame on you

Attachment Centre Village RIGS Project - Kopit Lodge

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Administrator on behalf of Kopit Lodge & Elsipogtog First Nation
Reference number: 247
Submitted: 2025-08-19 - 2:38 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
Attachment included
Summary of the Project Description for the Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project Submitted by: Kopit Lodge & Elsipogtog First Nation TABLE OF CONTENTS | i Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Elsipogtog First Nation ........................................................................................ 2 2.1 Kopit Lodge ..................................................................................................... 3 3.0 The Centre Village Renewables integration and Grid Security Project ........ 3 4.0 EFN Initial Comments on the Initial Project Description .................................. 6 Elsipogtog First Nation – Comments on the CV RIGS Project Description | 2 1.0 Introduction Elsipogtog First Nation (EFN, Elsipogtog) and Kopit Lodge have undertaken an initial review, as a part of the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) application process, for the Wattbridge/PROENERGY Holding Company Inc. (Wattbridge; the Proponent) proposed Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project (the Project, CV RIGS). This infrastructure project is intended to develop an additional 500 megawatt (MW) of in-province power generating capacity. The Project lies within our Sacred Traditional Territory, where our people have lived, hunted, fished, and gathered since time immemorial. Our connection to these lands and waters is inseparable from our identity, and any disturbance to this landscape carries implications for our rights, responsibilities, and cultural continuity. Despite generations of colonial ...

Attachment Poor Thought Out Project

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Diane Nowlan
Reference number: 243
Submitted: 2025-08-16 - 11:54 AM
Project phase: Planning
Why are we paying an American company to build and manage this project, when we are in a trade war with the USA, and our prime minister is proclaiming, "For Canadians, by Canadians "? Why is this project being built in an eco sensitive area? How green is this project? Won't gas and diesel create greenhouse gases? This project should be scrapped. It is not in line with the Linberal promises I voted for. Please reconsider this project.

Attachment Centre Village Project - Letter Writing Campaign

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Administrator on behalf of Sierra Club Canada Foundation
Reference number: 244
Submitted: 2025-08-15 - 5:14 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
Please see the attached submission. A total of 496 submissions of this form letter were submitted by Sierra Club Canada on behalf of individuals that responded to a form posted on the Sierra Club Canada website.
Attachment included
A total of 496 submissions of the attached form letter were received by Impact Assessment Agency of Canada between July 24, 2025 and August 13, 2025. They were submitted by Sierra Club Canada on behalf of individuals that responded to a form posted on the Sierra Club Canada website Letter to IAAC CC: The Honourable Dominic LeBlanc, MP for Beausejour To whom is may concern: I am writing to express my concern that a new gas and diesel fired electricity plant is being rushed through the impact assessment process in New Brunswick. This plant will be expensive and increase NB Power’s reliance on volatile fracked gas from the United States at a time when renewable energy and storage is becoming cheaper than fossil fuels. As wildfires burn across this country, we need to turn down the heat of climate change, not turn it up by burning more fracked gas and diesel. I am also concerned that the location of this plant in Tantramar New Brunswick will harm birds, wildlife and sensitive wetland complexes that make this key ecosystem between New Brunswick and Nova Scotia so unique and precious. The public has been given very little time - until August 13 - in the dog days of summer to comment on this first phase of the impact assessment of this project. Trying to push this through when most people are trying to enjoy their summer (and stay out of the heat) demonstrates a lack of respect for public consultation. Please put the brakes on this project and work with local communities to start up projects that respect the concern of the community and will advance energy democracy in New Brunswick.

Attachment Please allow NB to heal

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Sherry Dupuis
Reference number: 235
Submitted: 2025-08-15 - 12:30 PM
Project phase: Planning
Greetings! Understandably, climate change is pushing society and governments towards making difficult decisions about infrastructure, renewable energy, and the environment. Year after year, our efforts are falling short of demonstrating any real impacts. One thing is for sure, though, and that is destroying more environment won't solve anything, especially when it is ecologically sensitive. There is a clear lack of innovation, or, governments are not entertaining innovative ideas if they fly in the face of big corporations. The only reason people feel hope anymore is thanks to grassroots organizations and nonprofits... Our province is an environmental sinking ship, and no one is sounding the alarm. We need to consume less energy and live differently, but we're being steered towards towing the line. Please don't destroy more land for an ecologically dangerous project.

Attachment Opposed to this plan

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Andrew Ennals
Reference number: 234
Submitted: 2025-08-14 - 10:36 AM
Project phase: Planning
I would like to express my opposition to this project and the manner in which this whole process has been conducted. Not only is it irresonpsible to locate this plant in an ecologicaly sensitive area, but to do so as junior partners to a US company with a poor reputation at a time when we need to be focusing on Canadian energy sovereignty is the height of poor judgement. The secretive nature of the proposal waves many red flags as well. This whole proposal is simply unacceptable to local residents and the greater region.

Attachment This project makes no sense in an ecologically sensitive area and when it is too late for new fossil fuels infrastructure

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Anne Carbert
Reference number: 233
Submitted: 2025-08-14 - 8:17 AM
Project phase: Planning
It is unwise and short-sighted to build a project like this (1) on the Chignecto Isthmus, an ecological corridor, wetland area, and essential habitat for biodiversity, and (2) when climate impacts are intensifying and it is urgent to transition away from fossil fuels and gas-powered energy. It is also alarming (and frankly, embarrassing and shameful) that there has not been a full consultation process with Indigenous Nations, local governments, and the public.

Attachment Not aligned with Canada's interests

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Tantramar Resident
Reference number: 232
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 11:30 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I have read the Initial Project Description (IPD) and I attended two public sessions in Tantramar to learn about the proposed facility. I will mention a few concerns briefly, then I will focus on the the crux of the problem that calls for a federal government intervention in the form of a full environmental assessment or, better still, an integrated Canadian solution. The public meetings hindered rather than helped garner trust in the power utiity, the provincial government regulators, and the U.S.-based company that would operate the facility. From the outset, the "Renewables Integration and Grid Security" (RIGS) project name itself is off-putting as it attempts to soften the reality that this is a natural gas fuelled facility. At the community sessions there was a company claim of equity partnership implying this is already in place with Indigenous communities (shown in publicly shared documents), then it became clear this is false based on company responses to community questions. This accidental or overt mis-information is particularly egregious in the context of Reconciliation efforts as it appears to once again take advantage of Indigenous and suggest the project has their support. The company described a twenty+ year period of operations insinuating there may not be a need for the facility after that period, whereas company responses to questions at the public sessions indicated the twenty year period simply refers to the lease term and, not only do they expect the lease to be renewed, but they are hoping to expand facilities in Canada. New Brunswick Power is undergoing a review by the provincial government following a series of major errors, mis-management of infrastructure ...

Attachment comments on Centre Village Project

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Administrator on behalf of Dr. Mary Lou Harley
Reference number: 242
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 11:19 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
Attachment included
To The Impact Assessment Agency Canada August 13, 2025 Comments on Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Synchronous Condensing/Generation Facility Project - Initial Project Description By Ecological Justice Working Group, United Church of Canada, Regions East Contact: Dr. Mary Lou Harley Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this Initial Project Description prepared by PROENERGY Holding Company, Inc. The United Church of Canada has a long history of policies, documents, and submissions on social, environmental and ethical issues relating to energy issues and climate change. These Comments are grounded in that extensive base. Overall The proponent’s document is thin in required detail and documentation, dismissive of several aspects that need to be comprehensively addressed, and inadequate in information in areas of potential impacts particularly related to this site selection. The proponent provides comments but no data to justify this fossil fuel project as necessary to support a resilient grid that is able to ramp power up or down, shift loads, and balance variable power inputs like solar, wind, hydroelectric and geothermal as is the intention of modernized grids. Alternatives to this project for the grid-supportive purposes such as modern storage systems are not seriously presented with data. The site is completely unacceptable from an ecological assessment as well documented and nationally and internationally recognized, though not acknowledged by the proponent. The project site selection was made based on its proximity to an existing NB Power 138 kilovolt transmission line and the Maritimes and Northeast Pipeline (M&NP) 30” natural gas ...

Attachment Comments on the Initial Project Description and Environmental Impact Assessment Registration for the Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project - 89719.

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Administrator on behalf of Sierra Club Canada Foundation
Reference number: 237
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 10:44 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
Attachment included
Re: Comments on the Initial Project Description and Environmental Impact Assessment Registration for the Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project - 89719 Submitted via email: CentreVillage@iaac-aeic.gc.ca August 13, 2025 To whom it may concern: Please find below and attached Sierra Club Canada Foundation’s comments and supporting documents on the Project Description and Project Registration for the proposed 500 MW Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project (a dual-fuel gas plant with diesel backup in Centre Village, Tantramar). The Sierra Club Canada Foundation (SCCF) is a national grassroots charity that empowers people to be leaders in protecting, restoring and enjoying healthy and safe ecosystems. The Sierra Club Canada Foundation (SCCF) includes four regional chapters: Atlantic, Québec, Ontario, and Prairie, plus the Sierra Youth Coalition, a group whose mandate is to empower young people to become community leaders. It is clear that the proposed project will cause significant, foreseeable, and inadequately mitigated harm to the environment and the need for and alternatives to the project have not been adequately considered. As an organization committed to the rapid adoption of 100% clean energy solutions, protecting and restoring nature, and promoting energy democracy, we recommend the rejection of this project. If the project is not rejected at this stage, we recommend a full joint provincial-federal assessment of the project and / or a regional or strategic assessment as more appropriate methods to determine how best to meet increased and variable energy needs in New Brunswick for the next 25 years (which is the intended ...

Attachment Opposition to Proposed Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Helen Tucker
Reference number: 231
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 10:39 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
As a resident of the neighbouring community of Sackville, I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed gas power plant and my frustration with the process undertaken thus far. At a time when climate change is more immediately threatening to our region than ever, it would be far better to invest in clean, renewable sources of energy to stabilize our grid, rather than investing in a fossil fuel-based project. The potential threats to our local ecosystem outlined by EOS, Ducks Unlimited, and other local experts are alarming and should be a clear ground for requiring a comprehensive EIA prior to proceeding with the plant. The lack of transparency surrounding this project, the selection of ProEnergy as the developer and operator of the project, and the speed with which the project is advancing demostrate a shameful disregard for local stakeholders. Please take this opportunity to listen to the locals and work with us!

Attachment I strongly oppose this proposed facility!

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Steve Haley
Reference number: 230
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 10:10 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I am writing to strongly object to this foreign operated renewables facility being built in this beautiful wetland and marsh space where I live with my wife and children. As unprecedented wildfires ravage the country and record breaking temperatures are being recorded nearly every day, I am saddened by this proposal. We are well past the point where we need to take action to ward off climate change. More reliance on oil and gas is not the answer. Threatening our delicate ecosystems with new fossil fuel facilities is not ok. Enough is enough. We need more green and renewable energy and we needed it yesterday.

Attachment Unwarranted Pollution for US Profit

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Michelle Melanson
Reference number: 229
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 10:09 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
Not only is this a super polluting gas plant threatening the important wildlife corridor that is the Chignecto Isthmus, it's being placed near a Wildlife rehabilitation facility! On a wetland! Using American fracked gas! We are a resourceful province, and one that is promoting clean, sustainable energy sources to our residents. We can do so much better than this abomination. ProEnergy is trying to rush this through with only dollar bills in their eyes. They don't care about our land or its health, otherwise they wouldn't be rushing us through this. Keep your fracked gas, and stay out of our wetlands.

Attachment Against the centre Village Renewables Integration and grid security project

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Peter Stephenson
Reference number: 228
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 10:05 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
August 13, 2025 This is a letter against the Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project, a proposed gas turbine facility in Centre Village, NB, 20kms from Sackville, NB, from a concerned citizen of Tantramar, NB, and of the Chignecto Isthmus. I am deeply concerned about several aspects of the large gas and diesel 10-turbine facility (up to 500 megawatts, supplying up to 320,000 homes) being proposed for Centre Village, 20 kms from Sackville, NB, and located within the Chignecto Isthmus. First, and foremost, I have no confidence in the process being used to put this project in place. It feels like it is a fait accompli and that it will go through no matter how many citizens are against it. The public comment period was short, from mid July to mid August, when many are on vacation (and when the Legislative Assembly is on vacation) and our MLA did not find out about the project until right before its announcement. The mayor of Tantramar has also said that he felt blindsided by this announcement. This limited public access to information and consultation. The online sessions on July 21 and 22 were frustrating, to say the least, and it felt like they were just for show. A sit-down, question and answer session, duly recorded and administered by an impact assessment agency, and not by the Proenergy company, needs to happen. Instead, we are treated to an open house event, over two days and eight hours, August 12 and 13, 2025, right before the due date for questions to the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada, and hosted by the company leading the project, a clear conflict of interest in my books, and highly unprofessional. And Proenergy is going to redact a summary of the public’s ...

Attachment Opposition to Proposed Plant

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Alicia Steeves
Reference number: 227
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 10:05 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I want to register my opposition to the proposed power plant in Centre Village, NB. This project is short sighted and does not have the best interest of the local community and environment in mind. We are experiencing the effects of climate change this summer with the extreme drought conditions, and multiple areas of NB currently on fire, with higher than usual levels of fire activity. The province should be exploring truly renewable energy sources that do not rely on fossil fuels that will contribute to climate warming emissions. Furthermore, the Chignecto Isthmus is an important wildlife corridor and home to many species of wildlife. Their habitats have been degraded and are already in need of restoration, and this project would do the opposite, introducing dangerous gases and the very real threat of release of environmental contaminants into the surrounding waterways. The area is also the only land mass connecting Nova Scotia to the rest of Canada, and has high risk of flooding due to climate change. Finally, this plant would be owned by an American company - in a time of precarity and political turmoil it is ill advised to give power to American stakeholders. Do better NB Power, your ratepayers deserve a solution that preserves the area for generations to come, listens to environmental experts, and truly serves local community.

Attachment Not it

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Jeska Grue
Reference number: 226
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 10:04 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I am a resident of Sackville, NB that attended one of the earlier Zoom sessions in July as well as a Q&A in our town tonight. The irony to attend the session tonight in the same building our municipality has had to set up a cooling center due to record breaking, climate change-fueled heat. The anger to have to sit through swarmy non-responses by Proenergy when has been the region's dryest summer in 50+ years and we've all been tip toeing around not entering our local parks and woods, holding our breath any time we hear fire truck sirens. My concern is the same as the 100+ people gathered tonight, representative of thousands more in our community: wastewater management, irreversible ecological damage, migratory animal and bird populations, human health and wellbeing, is our public utility acting in the public's best interest and on and on. There has got to be a viable alternative energy generating project that NB Power can get behind. This one is not it.

Attachment After careful consideration

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Elaine MacDonald
Reference number: 225
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 10:04 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
After attending the presentation and question/answer meeting tonight at the Tantramar Veterans Civic Center and carefully weighing what was said, the conclusion I have is that there are more cons to the project in its current state than there are pros, least of which is a confusion by PROENERGY and NB Power about who is involved, who is not involved and anything about the region itself in terms of it’s environment and habitat. Overall, here is the summation I got from tonight’s meeting: - it's not a full power plant, but a back up that will run at most up to 7% and only if needed...? - It's in the preliminary stages; early enough that environment impact analysis' are not yet fully complete, the actual project isn't fully agreed to yet and they don't have numbers on power rates, costs of the project, etc. They have the backing of 7 Indigenous tribes who have formed into an LP to work with the company. - It's scheduled to begin Q1 in 2026, the Indigenous tribes aren't committed yet to the project, there is enough preliminary impact assessments of the environment to claim that the plant won't affect fish, the water nor any local wildlife, especially birds. (side note: sea trout can be found in the area's brooks/streams/rivers apparently, yet on boards describing the project there was indication of 'no fish impact', for example. Secondary side note: Fort Folly (Amlamgog) and Elsipogtog First Nation are noted tonight as saying: Elsipogtog is AGAINST this project (IIRC; if I am wrong I'm sure someone can correct that information). Fort Folly (Amlamgog) is requesting documents to look into it [assumption by me here is that ...

Attachment choose life over capital

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Geordie Miller
Reference number: 224
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 10:04 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I am writing as a resident of Sackville who strongly opposes the proposed project. The community--those of us who will be directly impacted by the deleterious health and environmental effects of this specific project--have spoken collectively and knowledgeably about the various reasons that this project is dead on arrival. The claims about the project's potential connection to "net zero" goals seem dubious. From a broader perspective, even the World Bank, so often an ally of companies like ProEnergy, acknowledged several years ago that “we’re on track for 4 degree Celsius warmer world by century’s end marked by extreme heat waves, declining global food stocks, loss of ecosystems and biodiversity, and life-threatening sea level rise. There is also no certainty that adaptation to a 4 degree Celsius world is possible.” The only certainty is that projects such as this one sow the seeds of future planetary and social devastation.

Attachment Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Sharyn Boyle
Reference number: 223
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 9:57 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I am writing to strongly object to the Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project in Tantramar, New Brunswick. 1. Climate change is devestating current and future life on earth and fossil fuels are the number one cause for this. We are past 'mitigating' impact: we must halt all new projects using them: especially considering the devestating effects of fracking wherever its sourced. 2. The potential for destruction of the crucial life-sustaining and sensitive environmental and connective Chignecto waterways can not be risked. 3. This gas and diesel burning plant is being planned for a rural area with no viable fire department, hospital or emergency services anywhere remotely close enough to respond if an emergency/explosion/fire/leak arises: which is GUARANTEED to take place over a 25-year contract with a foreign energy corporation that can not be trusted to follow through on regulations- see ProEnergy's track record and open court case in Venezuela. 4. The US is a highly unstable political entity that is threatening to colonize Canada, has overt designs on its natural resources, freshwater and Arctic, and is engaged in a tariff war against us. 5. This has been rushed through without any proper transparent community support, environmental, economic or health assessments, or honest all-in Indigenous consulation. 6. There is no honest plan or accountable responsiblility for what happens with this proposed toxic garbage land/building in 25 years. You are in for a messy public fight on your hands. WHAT IS NB POWER and the PROVINCIAL/FEDERAL governement THINKING even considering this project at this time in this place with these people???? -Shary Boyle

Attachment Opposition to the "Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project"

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Pamela Wheaton
Reference number: 222
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 9:41 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
As a multi generation local, with deep roots to this area, I cannot imagine living anywhere else. From the first tombstone in the Midgic Cemetery, it is like looking out at my family tree. I am deeply connected to this land, this land my family have worked on and given their lives to. I am raising my family here and carrying on the traditions of my people. This area is not an industrial site. This area is a natural gem full of irreplaceable wildlife and home to the vitally important Chignecto Isthmus - a vitally important wildlife corridor connecting NB to NS. Surrounded by National Wildlife Areas like the Tintamarre wetlands and Tantramar Marsh and protected lands everywhere across this region - wetlands and waterways dot and cross this whole area. Centre Village/Midgic is a nature preserve surrounded by open marshes worked by farmers like my family, by woodlands full of rich bio diversity, by old woods that are rich of life and make for irreplaceable animal habitats. You simply do not fill in a wetlands and clear cut an area like this. This is not the place for something of that scale, of that level of potential irreversible harm. The Chignecto Isthmus matters and the attempted avoidance of using that term 'Chignecto Isthmus' throughout this process is sickening. You cannot ignore this area by avoiding calling it what it is: a natural gem and an irreplaceable land corridor that needs to be left alone. To fill in a wetlands -- which is rich because they said that the Scoudouc industrial park site was not favourable due to 'wetlands' nearby, but have no problem filling in a site that itself is literally 50% wetlands by their own admission and surrounded by wetlands and woods in ...

Attachment Centre Village Gas Plant

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Anthony Maddalena
Reference number: 221
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 9:36 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I'd like to leave a comment as a concerned local citizen of the Tantramar area regarding the proposed power plant in the centre village area. This project unnecessarily puts our natural resources at risk. The land connection between NS and NB, the provinces only wildlife rehabilitation centre (Atlantic Wildlife Instittute), and the local water supply for folks living directly adjacent to the proposed site would all be at high risk if this plant were to be built. I strongly disagree with this project and the environmental assessments that have been done to date. Thanks.

Attachment Cetre Village

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Tantramar
Reference number: 220
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 9:24 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I feel that transparency is important and the project info was held from everyone one in Tantramar,nb until it showed up in a social media post. No info or meeting with the Council and no support from Fort Folly indigenous band. No concerns about the wildlife, bird migration, resident water supply, road restrictions in the Municipality of Tantramar, driving through residential areas on narrow roads. Also close proximity to the Ramsar site, the isthmus and bird sanctuary and fishing rivers & lskes. Climate change, extreme heat & running these turbine generators in the middle of a forest, while all across Canada there are out of control fires. Stop this & think greener ways, batteries, solar & wind generation, not fossil fuel. Think Canadian & refocus this. They don't even have an emergency plan in their heads.

Attachment Transparency and trust

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Olivia Kingston
Reference number: 219
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 9:05 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
From what I gathered at tonight's Q&A session, the panel of people answering the questions could not accurately and clearly answer the questions. They dragged on their answers, filled them with jargon that civilians are sure to not understand, and sure enough, when it was not understood, they talked to us like we were idiots. What we need from this project is TRANSPARENCY. You need to be MUCH clearer on WHY this is the best option. The community does not UNDERSTAND why you think this is the best option, and you cannot get mad when people are confused. You get NOWHERE by treating the community like idiots. They are far from unintelligent. The people of Tantramar know far more about the land, wildlife, and water than anyone else. You need to LISTEN to their concerns. I strongly felt we got nowhere with tonight's Q&A. Partly yes, because the community is already so frustrated, many do not have the capacity to listen anymore. But also because you did not have real, transparent, truthful answers to give us peace of mind. We need explicit detail on every single assessment and clear information on why this is the best option without demeaning the community for their extremely valid concerns.

Attachment Concerned citizen

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Hilary Dean
Reference number: 218
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 8:53 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I think a lot of these comments can better articulate the major concerns we have about this project. The secrecy, and trying to hide this and slip it under the radar. Not telling important officials like our MLA Megan Mitton, why? We know why, don't we? The severe environmental impacts are a huge concern. This area like many special environments cannot handle this impact to its ecosystem. And then bringing in US companies? In this political climate? I'm not sure what concern is worse here. You need to let residents, officials, scientists, etc have their say and not try to sneak this past people. Listen to us. Listen to experts. sincerely, a concerned citizen and VOTER.

Attachment Inaccurate description of Indigenous role in project

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Elizabeth Stregger
Reference number: 217
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 8:50 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I am submitting an addendum to my previous comment, no. 166, in which I requested a complete environmental impact assessment of this project. At a question and answer event hosted by PROENERGY in Tantramar on August 13, we found out that the documents submitted to the IAAC and shared at community events misrepresent the level of engagement with Indigenous stakeholders. On page 4 of their submission, PROENERGY says that: "WattBridge will also continue to engage NSMTC as a minor equity partner in the Project." Their poster presentation at open houses on August 12 and 13 claims that "Facility will be owned by PROENERGY and the North Shore Mi'kmaq Tribal Council (NSMTC) under a 25-year power purchase agreement with NB Power." At the event on August 13, a representative of the NSMTC said that they have an option to become equity partners. This has not yet happened and he was unwilling or unable to speak on behalf on communities that the proponent claimed in IAAC Zoom consultations were very happy with this deal. The First Nations listed in the proponent's documents may never be minor equity stakeholders - their investment is yet to be decided. I understand why we may not have access to contract language, but I believe that the materials shared by the proponents are intentionally deceptive. This should be a massive red flag for the IAAC and all agencies involved in evaluating this proposal. I am amending my first comment. I am now requesting that the contract between PROENERGY and NB Power be dissolved. Whatever the cost in time and money, this project cannot be allowed to go forward. We have no reason to trust the documentation that the proponent provided to the ...
Attachment included
Please see the attachment to view the content.
Attachment included
Please see the attachment to view the content.

Attachment La centrale au gaz fossile proposée ne réduira pas les émissions de gaz à effet de serre

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Professeur d'études de l'environnement, Université de Moncton
Reference number: 216
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 8:31 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
Le résumé du projet préparé par la compagnie ProEnergy n'inspire pas confiance : une lecture rapide révèle qu'il est truffé d'incohérences et présente quelques silences inquiétants. Comme je ne dispose que de peu de temps pour exprimer mon commentaire, je mentionnerai seulement un problème évident dans le calcul des émissions annuelles de gaz à effet de serre à la p. 50 (qui d'ailleurs ne présente pas la méthode de calcul utilisée), un manque flagrant de détail sur les eaux usées et leur déversement, qu'on propose de faire simplement dans le fossé d'une route locale, et un flou stratégique quant à la compagnie qui fournira le gaz et le diesel (Irving Oil?...). On dit que le projet contribuera à réduire les émissions de gaz à effet de serre. C'est évidemment faux : en brûlant du gaz et/ou du diesel dans une nouvelle centrale, on augmente les émissions. La compagnie et le gouvernement provincial se permettent d'avancer cet argument parce qu'ils comparent ce projet de centrale au pire cas possible, soit la construction d'une centrale au charbon de même capacité - ce qui serait bien sûr impossible puisque qu'il ne sera plus permis d'utiliser du charbon pour produire de l'électricité au pays à partir de 2030. Les promoteurs du projet de centrale utilisent donc une stratégie trompeuse pour faire croire au public qu'il s'agit d'un projet qui protège l'environnement, alors que ce ...

Attachment Environmental concerns for Chignecto Isthmus and surrounding communities

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Meaghan Mullins
Reference number: 215
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 8:29 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I'm writing on behalf of myself and my family as residents of Strait Shores. We would like to express our concerns and opposition of the Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project. We oppose the construction of this gas powered plant because of the environmental effects that it will have on the whole South-East region of New Brunswick, specifically the Chignecto Isthmus. The Chignecto Isthmus is an environmentally sensitive area that is the home of many species that are already at risk and is the only corridor of land connecting New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. It is also a vital migratory path for many bird species. We are also concerned about the projects use of ground water and how the local wetlands, wells, brooks, streams, rivers, and lakes will be impacted. The placement of the power plant on ground that is higher than the surrounding areas means that the discharged effluent will be dispersed to the lower lying areas that feed into the local waterways and ultimately to both the Bay of Fundy and the Northumberland Strait. The impact of this on the fish and aquaculture is also unknown. On a more personal level our son attends Nature Camps held at the the Atlantic Wildlife Institute which is located very close to the Centre Village RIGS project. He has learned so many things about the local environment and wildlife. As a young person he is very concerned about how the animals and birds will be impacted. We are disappointed in the lack of communication and oversight concerning the approval of this project. We encourage decision makers to stop this project until independent environmental and community impact studies are conducted and ...

Attachment Expressing my strong opposition to Centrevilles Integration and Grid Security Project

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Elisabeth Hummel
Reference number: 214
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 8:22 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
As residents of the municipality of Tantramar, we express our strong opposition to the Centreville Integration and Grid Security Project. We are deeply concerned about the environmental impact this would have on the flaura and fauna of the already fragile Chignecto Isthmus. We will leave the scientific explanation to the submissions of both EOS Eco Energy and Atlantic Wildlife Institute, with which we wholeheartedly agree. We write this, as we are experiencing the climate crisis first hand with out of control fires in our province. Now is not the time for investing in more fossil fuel project, but we need to think of real sustainable solutions like wind, solar or tidal energy, so that our creation, which is suffering, can find ways to heal from the impact of human greed. Sincerely, Elisabeth Hummel and Heather McClure

Attachment I shouldn't have to say anything...

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Luke PATTERSON
Reference number: 213
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 8:17 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
To whom this reaches, My name is Luke Patterson. I am a 39 yr old Father of 2 , who has lived in this area my entire life. Indeed, I could be considered a 'life-long' resident of the Tantramar area, since I intend to be here and have no plans to move anywhere else , in my life. That's not to say I haven't spent time elsewhere. I have seen the general degradation that power production in the fossil fuel sector first hand while working in reforestation in Alberta, among other places. I have always been thankful that home here in NB does ~not~ have a burning ( smoke stack) reminder that if left to their druthers, some of us would choose to go further in the wrong direction, environmentally speaking. At what feels like maybe the worst time to do so. I am opposed to this development and would urge those in charge to look at greener options all around. Luke Patterson , B.Mus

Attachment Opposition to Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Evelyn Lorenzen
Reference number: 212
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 7:56 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I am writing to express my opposition to the Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project due to concern of global climate change. This project will secure New Brunswick and Canada in a future containing fossil fuels and delaying the shift to renewable energy further. The money going toward this project would be much better invested in renewables to benefit the people of New Brunswick longer while also benefitting the global population by reducing climate change. This project is a poor investment and only an easy solution to the needed 500MW.

Attachment Opposed to Project

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Jessica Prescott
Reference number: 211
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 7:46 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I am a resident of Sackville, New Brunswick and I am opposed to the Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project. At this point, given what we know about climate change and the impact of fossil fuels, an EIA is not needed to prove that this project should not go forward. I would like to see our province invest in renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, and a concerted effort to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.

Attachment Consultation, Environmental and Social Impact, and a lack of transparency and due diligence

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Brent Dearling
Reference number: 210
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 7:39 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
There has been no public participation or consultation relating to the development or planning of this project through engagement of the individuals living within the region, and has not fulfilled any environmental or social impact assessments. While it is encouraging that the project has consulted with indigenous people, the blatant lack of involvement of those living within the community, the agencies of elected officials or government representatives, or other community stakeholders speaks volumes to the lack of consideration this project has for the people living within the extended region that the project will share a social and environmental landscape with. This lack of transparency and involvement brings many questions to the forefront of this projects development, many of which will remain unanswered due to a lack of an environmental impact assessment and many other incomplete assessments on the part of the proposed project. Due to this lack of consultation and due diligence on the part of the proposed project, it should not be allowed to proceed. Proper consideration beyond a bare minimum of site selection based on convenience due to the intersection of a gas line and power distribution, a minimal historical importance for indigenous peoples of the region, and minimal ecological impacts on fish spawning grounds are not ample enough reasons to support the development of this project. Many questions remain regarding how local infrastructure will be impacted from ground water to road conditions for locals, if local services will be able to respond adequately in environmental or health emergencies given the limited access and availability of services for EMT, local/volunteer Fire or other ...

Attachment Climate, Location, and Environmental Concerns

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Barbra Clayton
Reference number: 209
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 7:25 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I would like to register my opposition to the project due to concerns about increased fossil fuel dependence and GHG emissions, the threats to wildlife, and ecological risks, such as watershed health, and air and sound pollution. To elaborate on these concerns: Fossil fuel dependence and GHG emissions: The proposed project would prolong our dependence on burning fossil fuels (natural gas and diesel) for at least 25 years, and the fracked gas on which this project depends entails the release of methane, a potent GHG, all along its line of production. This project will thus undermine our urgent need to cease all GHG emissions, and undercut our ability to meet the federal government’s climate target of net-zero by 2050, as well as the provincial climate targets. Thus to propose a natural gas or diesel powered project in order to meet our energy needs—at a time when there are climate change-induced fires threatening communities in Canada and New Brunswick-- is irresponsible and short-sighted. NB Power should consider alternative ways to meet the challenge of balancing the grid and back-stopping renewable energy, such as through the use of utility-scale batteries, or through the enhancement of our use of hydro-electric energy. Threats to wildlife: The location of the proposed project is right in the center of a highly sensitive and narrow wildlife corridor on the Chignecto Isthmus, which has been identified by Parks Canada as one 23 regions where conservation and ecological restoration is critically ...

Attachment Opposition to Gas Powered Plant

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Administrator on behalf of Zoë Knight
Reference number: 238
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 6:47 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
Good morning. My name is Zoë Knight, I am reaching out to express my opposition to the NB Power approved Grid Security Project Gas Plant that is proposed to be built in the Centre Village of New Brunswick. While this project claims to be creating renewable sources, I find this to be a false claim after reviewing Project Description. Foremost there is no strategy assignment implemented and that is greatly concerning. 25 years is a long time to contract new energy plans. The plans no where mention the actual consideration of why this benefits any person or land but only considers the benefits of creating energy, but who does it benefit really? The plans of the layout of the plant also take up a significant amount of forrest landmass. Recently there have been numerous wildfires spanning across parts of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. The levels of electricity, hydro, and concrete that is planned to be poured into the soil of the land will limit resources and harm surrounding wildlife and communities while this is already increasingly dire. The strategies are limited I understand but this nor the coal plans are very useful. I fear this impacts will be irreversible. New Brunswick has brilliant forrest and wildlife and this plan would be detrimental not only for the people, but the wildlife too. The outline says they plan on having conversations with Indigenous communities but these have not yet taken place and this worries me to great lengths. I live in Westmorland, where the plant is set to be built. I do not want to see the place I live and am from being depleted of its sources in such a haste and inconceivable manner. Please I ask those involved to seriously reconsider Zoë

Attachment Opposition to the 'Center Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project' - Consider future generations

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Quinn MacAskill
Reference number: 208
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 6:44 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed project. We are in a climate emergency that has been caused by the burning of fossil fuels. The climate crisis has already resulted in loss of life in all parts of the world, with a disproportionate impact on marginalized populations. The science is clear: we must stop burning fossil fuels in order to mitigate this crisis and prevent further loss of life and ecosystems. The more fossil fuels we emit, the closer the risk of crossing irreversable tipping points in Earth's ecological systems. The global context is crucial to understand, because the actions we take here have implications for lives in other parts of the world. Canada is a privileged country; we have both the opportunity and the responsibility to transition to renewable energy. The proposed project would lock New Brunswick into decades more of fossil fuel use. This cannot happen. We do not have the carbon budget globally to be undertaking new fossil fuel projects. The project proposal includes misleading information such as labeling this as a "renewable" project, as well as unsubstantiated claims in emissions reporting, stating that more sustainable technology will exist when it is eventually time to decomission the power plant so emissions numbers can be reduced. The Chignecto Isthmus is a critical migratory corridor, home to fragile wetland ecosystems and many endangered species. A comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment must be conducted, and consultation with local Indigenous communities remains inadequate. We must rethink any project that emits greenhouse gases, and focus instead on reducing our overall energy consumption. Climate change demands that ...

Attachment More transparency needed!!

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Megan Macdonald
Reference number: 207
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 6:17 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I have serious concerns about the placement of a facility in the vulnerable isthmus of Chignecto, concerns about the fact we are not investing in renewable energy sources, and concerns about the lack of regulatory oversight in this project. Public hearings are needed.

Attachment Opposition to the Centre Village RIGS

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Linda Pearse
Reference number: 206
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 6:04 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I am writing as a resident of Midgic and co-owner of 100 acres of farmland, animals, gardens, and woods to express my deep concern and strong opposition to the proposed Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project. I request that a comprehensive impact assessment be undertaken per the guidelines suggested by DUC and that all further action toward this project be brought to a sober halt. The Sikniktewaq/Chignecto Isthmus is home to protected areas for wildlife, migratory birds and wildlife, fish populations, not to mention many farms with crops, livestock, and other animals, such as ours. It is horrifying that local food producers have not been consulted in this process. We, as New Brunswickers, have a responsibility not only to support local farmers, but also to consider those who live within this beloved region—our community members who hike, cycle, and hunt on these lands and along the Canada Trail which bisects our beloved century-farm property. The planned discharge of wastewater into the marshlands without serious consideration of environmental impacts is unconscionable. I shudder at the lack of transparency and genuine consultation, including the attempt to rush a process through during the summer weeks when so many residents are travelling. The decision not to notify this region's MLA and the mayor of Tantramar is equally disappointing. In short, a gas plant that produces harmful emissions and requires precious water resources should not be built in the middle of a region with increasing fire risk and with sensitive wetlands. Respectfully, Linda Pearse 66 Midgic ...

Attachment Letter in opposition to the (fossil fuel) gas plant.

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Gayle Martin
Reference number: 205
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 5:53 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
To tell you my history with (and love for) this century farm that I purchased 22 years ago, having devoted much money and time in its restoration and upkeep, would be fruitless because a large American company wants to infiltrate our way of life in rural New Brunswick to line their pockets with money and with little regard to the environment and people/farmers who live here. It seems apparent—by attending information gatherings—that ‘they’ are bulldozing a path to what THEY want, regardless of what others may feel or what the environment needs (or NOT!). The environment is suffering terribly—consider the oven that we have been baking in this week and the lack of water (near drought conditions) this summer. We are suffering terribly because of fossil fuels and to allow such a to be built would be a criminal act in my opinion. Why would Canadians and New Brunswickers allow this facility to be built in our backyard? It would be an abomination. With love for my neighbors and surroundings, Gayle h Martin 66 Midgic Station Road, Midgic, NB

Attachment Disappointment in plans for LNG Power plant in Midgic

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Nicholas Thompson
Reference number: 204
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 5:08 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
I write to express my disappointment with the decision to move forward with a natural gas plant in Midgic, NB. Natural gas has played an important role in displacing coal globally, and will continue to do so in many parts of the world that are not in the position Canada is now. This project represents a failure of foresight. Building natural gas infrastructure in Canada now is to use a 20-year-old solution to today’s problems. This is short-sighted, economically regressive, and an insult to ratepayers who deserve a forward-thinking energy strategy. At a time when wildfires ravage our province’s forests due to extreme heat (a crisis we all understand is driven by greenhouse gas emissions) the doubling down on fossil fuel dependency is indefensible. Canadians are disproportionate emitters; we must leverage our wealth, expertise, and moral responsibility to lead, not lag behind. I emphatically oppose this project and urge reconsideration. Instead, New Brunswick should maximize renewable energy sources of wind and solar with grid-scale storage. We should improve the capacity factor at Point Lepreau to its highest potential. We should invest in non-fossil fuel grid stability solutions to maintain grid inertia, and frequency stability, and invest in our grid to support a green energy build-out, rather than fossil fuel dependant peaker-plants. Awarding this contract to a US firm further compounds the issue, outsourcing both economic benefits and energy sovereignty. NB Power and the provincial government must consult broader expertise to prioritize a resilient, low-carbon grid, not lock us into decades of LNG purchases. We can do better, and the world is ...

Attachment Negative health outcomes foreseeable from the proposed Centre Village gas plant

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment - New Brunswick
Reference number: 203
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 4:47 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
It is with deep concern and dismay that as physicians and healthcare providers representing the Canadian Association of Physicians (CAPE) in New Brunswick we submit our comments regarding the proposed Centre Village dual-fuel gas plant. CAPE is a national non-partisan, physician-led organization with over 36,000 supporters. We have regional CAPE committees in 9 provinces, including New Brunswick. We bring an evidence-based approach to the intersecting issues of health, environment, and social justice. Climate change is the leading global threat to human health As physicians and health care providers, we see the impact that climate change is having on the communities we serve. Today, August 13, 2025, the province of New Brunswick is under a heat warning, with temperatures hovering around 36–37 degrees Celsius (Humidex 38 to 43). There are 11 actives wildfires in the province with two deemed out of control, and several communities are on evacuation notice. Wildfire smoke is contributing to poor air quality; people’s homes and lives are at risk. As the Canadian Climate Institute reports, “Accelerating climate change, largely from the burning of fossil fuels, makes wildfires bigger, hotter, and more frequent.” The Climate Shift Index (CSI) map shows that climate change made the extreme high temperatures in Fredericton, the province’s capital, 5 times more likely today. CSI ...

Attachment MTI Comments on Summary IPD for Centre Village Project

Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project
Author: Administrator on behalf of Erica Ward - Mi'gmawe'l Tplu'taqnn Incorporated (MTI)
Reference number: 239
Submitted: 2025-08-13 - 4:46 PM
Project phase: Planning
Participation notice: Public Notice - Comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Summary of the Initial Project Description
See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
Attachment included
August 13, 2025 VIA EMAIL: Centrevillage@iaac-aeic.gc.ca Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) Government of Canada Re: Comments on the Summary Initial Project Description for the proposed Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project Please accept these comments on the Initial Project Description (IPD) for the proposed Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project Located in Centre Village, New Brunswick, on behalf of Mi’gmawe’l Tplu’taqnn Incorporated (MTI) – a non-profit organization who represents eight of their nine member Mi’gmaq First Nation communities in New Brunswick: Amlamgog (Fort Folly) First Nation, Natoaganeg (Eel Ground) First Nation, Oinpegitjoig (Pabineau) First Nation, Esgenoôpetitj (Burnt Church) First Nation, Tjipõgtõtjg (Buctouche) First Nation, L’nui Menikuk (Indian Island) First Nation, Ugpi’ganjig (Eel River Bar) First Nation and Metepenagiag Mi’kmaq Nation for purposes of consultation. Mi’gmawe’l Tplu’taqnn received notification of the proposed Centre Village Renewables Integration and Grid Security Project, on July 14, 2025. Although MTI staff were aware of a possible project, the MRIA could not be initiated until the Initial Project Description was received on July 14, 2025. The Mi’gmaq are the original inhabitants of New Brunswick. We have occupied and cared for our lands and waters since time immemorial. Along with our Wabanaki brothers and sisters, we entered into sacred, constitutionally protected Treaties of Peace and Friendship with the Crown, and continue to exercise our Aboriginal and Treaty rights, including the rights to hunt, fish and gather up to the present day. The Treaties have been upheld, and ...

Report a problem on this page

Date modified:: 2019-03-01