Public Participation Plan
Impact Assessment of the Gazoduq Project
FINAL VERSION
July 17, 2020
Contents
- List of Tables
- List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Project Description
- 3. Objectives of Public Participation
- 4. Distribution List
- 5. Public Participation Tools
- 6. Activities and Public Participation Approach
- 7. Funding
- 8. Contact Information and How to Submit Comments
- Appendix
List of Tables
- Table 1: Table of Public Participation Approaches and Activities
- Table 2: Addresses of viewing centres
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
- Agency
- Impact Assessment Agency of Canada
- BAPE
- Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement du Québec
- BAPE Review Panel
- A Review Panel formed by the president of the Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement under section 4 of the Rules of procedure of the Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement (CQLR, c. Q-2, r. 45.1)
- CER
- Canada Energy Regulator
- CERA
- Canadian Energy Regulator Act
- Federal Review Panel
- An integrated federal review panel formed under subsection 47 (1) of the Impact Assessment Act whose mandate covers both the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act
- IAA
- Impact Assessment Act
- Project
- Gazoduq Project
- Public Registry
- Canadian Impact Assessment Registry
1. Introduction
Public participation is an essential part of open, informed and meaningful impact assessment. The Government of Canada is committed to providing the public with the opportunity to participate meaningfully in the process and to provide them with the information needed to participate in an informed way. The Impact Assessment Act (IAA) requires the development of a Public Participation Plan during the planning phase for all projects subject to an impact assessment. The Public Participation Plan is designed to provide proponents and participants with certainty about how and when public participation will occur. Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the IAA, this plan must be provided to the proponent at the same time as the notice of commencement, at the end of the planning phase.
On January 22, 2020, the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (the Agency) determined that an impact assessment is required for the Gazoduq Project (the Project), in accordance with section 16 of the IAA. Since the Project is subject to the IAA and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act (CERA), the impact assessment was automatically referred to a review panel and must meet the legal requirements of both these acts. A review panel whose mandate covers both the IAA and the CERA is an "integrated review panel" (the Federal Review Panel). The Agency will coordinate the impact assessment process with the Canada Energy Regulator (the CER). Upon completion of the impact assessment, if the Project is approved, the CER will be responsible for the Project's follow-up phase, as the federal regulator of the life cycle of gas pipeline projects.
To facilitate the coordination of public participation activities, including public hearings, to harmonize timelines and to promote more efficient use of resources, the Government of Canada and the Government of Quebec have entered into the Canada-Quebec Cooperation Agreement on the Coordination of the Environmental Assessment and Impact Assessment Processes for the Gazoduq Project (the Agreement). The Agreement spells out the terms and conditions for cooperation and coordination of the two jurisdictions' environmental and impact assessment processes, while recognizing the powers, laws and regulations of each level of government and supporting environmental protection and public participation. This Plan was updated to reflect the process detailed in the Agreement.
The plan is designed to be flexible, so that the Agency or the Federal Review Panel can modify the approaches described in it to reflect changes in the impact assessment process or accommodate comments and requests received from participants.
The plan may also be adjusted if COVID-19 is still a threat to public health when the Agency or the Federal Review Panel organizes participation opportunities for the Project. For example, the Agency or the Federal Review Panel may decide that virtual sessions would be safer than in-person sessions. If a change in the process, timelines, tools or participation opportunities is required, the Agency or the Federal Review Panel will post a public notice on the Public Registry and will send an email to the distribution list to notify participants.
For more information on public participation, please see the Interim Framework: Public Participation Under the Impact Assessment Act and Interim Guidance: Public Participation Under the Impact Assessment Act. A separate plan for engagement and partnership with Indigenous peoples has also been developed. The Indigenous Engagement and Partnership Plan for the impact assessment of the Gazoduq Project describes opportunities for Indigenous engagement and related approaches.
2. Project Description
Gazoduq Inc. (the Proponent) is proposing to construct and operate a natural gas pipeline approximately 780 kilometres long between northeastern Ontario and Saguenay, Quebec. This Project would connect TC Energy Limited's existing main natural gas transmission system in northeastern Ontario to the proposed Saguenay Energy Project, a natural gas liquefaction facility proposed by LNG Quebec in Saguenay, Quebec. The Project would also include three compressor stations, one metering station, approximately 25 block valves and an associated control centre.
For more information on the impact assessment of the Gazoduq Project or to view the information and comments received, visit the Canadian Impact Assessment Registry (the Public Registry) at https://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/evaluations/proj/80264?culture=en-CA.
3. Objectives of Public Participation
The Public Participation Plan was developed to describe the ways in which a participant can provide input and take part in the impact assessment process. The Agency's objectives for public participation are as follows:
- Public participation is meaningful. This means that members of the public who want to take part in the impact assessment have the opportunity to do so, have the information they need, and have the capacity to participate in an informed manner. The IAA recognizes the importance of meaningful public participation and requires that opportunities to participate be made available in the assessment process, in keeping with legislation and regulations and Agency policies and directives.
- The public is engaged early and often, especially in each key phase of the impact assessment process.
- The public is involved in the development or revision of key documents, including this plan, the Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines, the Federal Review Panel's Terms of Reference, the Proponent's Impact Statement, the draft potential conditions, and, if applicable, potential changes to the Decision Statement.
- In the case of an impact assessment conducted by a Federal Review Panel, the impact assessment report, including the proposed conditions, is prepared by the Federal Review Panel, and public participation takes the form of comments and participation in public hearings.
- In-person public participation activities are held in communities most likely to be affected by the proposed Project.
- The selection of participation opportunities and mechanisms is based on the needs and interests of the public, which may include, but are not limited to, comment periods, public hearings, and in-person or virtual information or consultation events, at each key phase in the process.
- Public comments received during participation events are documented and inform decision making.
The objectives of the Public Participation Plan have been incorporated into the Federal Review Panel's Terms of Reference.
4. Distribution List
Throughout the impact assessment process, the Agency or the Federal Review Panel's secretariat will develop and maintain a distribution list for the impact assessment. Individuals and organizations on the distribution list will receive updates and notices about the Project's impact assessment as the process unfolds.
If you wish to be on the distribution list, please send an email to iaac.gazoduq.aeic@canada.ca with your full name and email address.
If you indicated that you would like to be added to the distribution list when you signed in to the online Public Registry or at an information session, please do not sign up again.
During the planning phase, the Agency received a total of 927 comments on subjects such as the Initial Project Description, the draft Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines, the draft Public Participation Plan, the draft Terms of Reference for the Integrated Review Panel and the Canada-Québec Cooperation Agreement. To view all comments received to date, please visit the Public Registry at https://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/evaluations/proj/80264?culture=en-CA.
5. Public Participation Tools
In order to ensure meaningful public participation during the impact assessment process, the following communication and participation tools will be used:
- Public notices posted on the Public Registry, published in newspapers and broadcast on the radio;
- Emails to the distribution list;
- Updates on the Project's impact assessment on social media (e.g., tweets on the Agency's Twitter account);
- Printed copies of key documents held in viewing centres in Matheson, Virginiatown, Kirkland Lake, Timmins, Ramore, Rouyn-Noranda, Amos, La Sarre, Senneterre, Shawinigan, Val d'Or, La Tuque, Roberval, Alma and Saguenay. Upon request, the Agency will consider adding viewing centres (see Appendix 1 for viewing centre addresses);
- Interactive community sessions; and
- Training on the impact assessment process and how to participate effectively during the processFootnote1.
The Agency will ensure that its documents added to the Public Registry are accessible to visually impaired people, this means that these documents will be adapted to allow the content to be read aloud by a screen reader. The Agency will also encourage the Proponent to adopt this practice.
Public comment periods will also be used to gather participants' input on key documents, such as the Proponent's Impact Statement, the draft potential conditions, and, if applicable, potential changes to the Decision Statement. In addition, the Federal Review Panel has a legal obligation to hold public hearings. All public hearing sessions will be broadcast online in real time. Links to the live or recorded video will be posted on the Public Registry and sent to the distribution list. These tools are explained in more detail in Table 1 below.
Other communication and participation tools may also be used, including the following:
- Interactive information sessions;
- Prearranged virtual sessions with a public presentation and a question-and-answer period, which will be broadcast online in real time. Links to the live or recorded video will be posted on the Public Registry and sent to the distribution list;
- Focus groups; and/or
- Technical workshops.
Note that this list is not exhaustive and may be adjusted during the course of the impact assessment to facilitate public participation and to ensure efficient execution of the impact assessment.
6. Activities and Public Participation Approach
Table 1 below provides a description of the main phases in the impact assessment process and an outline of engagement opportunities in each phase, including events led by the Agency or the Federal Review Panel. It shows the objectives of each phase, the anticipated engagement activities, the public participation tools that support the engagement activities, and the timelines.
All segments of the population, including but not limited to, members of the public, non-governmental organizations, government agencies and Indigenous peoples, as well as the proponent, are welcome to participate in the engagement activities outlined below. As previously noted, a separate plan for engagement and partnership with Indigenous peoples has also been developed.
Objectives of the Phase |
Expected Activities |
Public Participation Tools |
Timelines |
---|---|---|---|
Phase 1: Planning |
|||
|
|
|
|
Phase 2: Impact Statement |
|||
|
|
|
|
Phase 3: Impact assessment conducted by the Federal Review Panel |
|||
|
|
|
|
Phase 3: Impact assessment led by the Agency |
|||
|
|
|
|
Phase 4: Decision-making |
|||
|
|
|
|
Phase 5: Post-decision |
|||
|
If the Project is approved:
|
If the Project is approved:
|
If the Project is approved:
|
6.1 Proponent's information and consultation process
For information on the Proponent's plans for information and consultation during the impact assessment process, see the Proponent's website: https://gazoduq.com/en/.
The Agency requires the Proponent to inform and consult local communities, associations and members of the public to gather information, identify potential effects of the Project and appropriate mitigation measures, and address concerns throughout the impact assessment process. The Agency also requires the Proponent to prepare the Impact Statement with due consideration of Indigenous and community knowledge, if provided, and to validate the information in the Impact Statement with participants before formally submitting it to the Agency for review. For more information about the Agency's requirements for the Proponent, please consult the Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines: https://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/evaluations/document/135390?culture=en-CA.
The Proponent and its experts will also be required to attend the public hearings held by the BAPE Review Panel and the Federal Review Panel. The Review Panels may, among other things, ask the Proponent to provide information about its Project, including potential effects, the assessment of those effects, mitigation and follow-up measures, and the findings of the proponent's assessment.
7. Funding
Funding is available to support participation of some members of the public. For information about the activities that are eligible for funding or to submit an application for funding, see the National Funding Program Guidelines: https://www.canada.ca/en/impact-assessment-agency/services/policy-guidance/participant-funding-program-national-program-guidelines.html.
8. Contact Information and How to Submit Comments
Until the Federal Review Panel closes the record, comments may be submitted at any time during the impact assessment process by using the "Submit a comment" feature on the Project's page on the Public Registry (reference number 80264, at https://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/evaluations/proj/80264?culture=en-CA). Attachments can be uploaded using this feature. If you have any difficulties with the submission process, please contact the Agency and, when the Federal Review Panel is appointed, the Federal Review Panel's secretariat, using the contact information below. Comments may also be submitted by email to iaac.gazoduq.aeic@canada.ca or by regular mail.
Comments and other documents received by the Agency will form part of the Project record and will be posted on the Canadian Impact Assessment Registry website. The Agency's Submission PolicyFootnote2 determines what information can be shared publicly and what information should remain private. For more information on how we protect your privacy, please refer to the Privacy Notice.Footnote3 If you do not want your comment to be posted on the Public Registry, please contact the Agency before submitting your comment.
If you have questions or need information, please contact:
Impact Assessment Agency of Canada – Gazoduq Project
160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa ON K1A 0H3
Telephone: 613-222-3507
Email: iaac.gazoduq.aeic@canada.ca
Appendix
City or Town |
Address |
---|---|
Alma, Quebec |
Bibliothèque municipale d'Alma |
Amos, Quebec |
Bibliothèque municipale d'Amos |
Kirkland Lake, Ontario |
Teck Centennial Public Library |
La Sarre, Quebec |
Bibliothèque municipale Richelieu |
La Tuque, Quebec |
Bibliothèque municipale de La Tuque |
Matheson, Ontario |
Matheson Public Library |
Timmins, Ontario |
Timmins Public Library |
Ramore, Ontario |
Ramore Library |
Roberval, Quebec |
Bibliothèque Georges-Henri-Lévesque |
Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec |
Bibliothèque municipale de Rouyn-Noranda |
Saguenay, Quebec |
Bibliothèque municipale de Chicoutimi |
Shawinigan, Quebec |
Bibliothèque Fabien-Larochelle |
Senneterre, Quebec |
Bibliothèque intermunicipale de Senneterre |
Val-d'Or, Quebec |
Bibliothèque de Val-d'Or |
Document Reference Number: 857