Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina

Attachment Request to IAAC and Province of Ontario for a full Environmental / Impact Assessment

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association
• Numéro de référence : 107
• Présenté : 2025-12-30 12 h 33
• Phase du projet : Planification
• The Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association is requesting a full and joint Impact/Environmental Assessment of the 2.6 km Fixed Link. The Georgina Island First Nations has recently filed its Detailed Project Plan (DPD) and we disagree with a number of representations made and note a number of omissions in the DPD. We believe that the “Co-operation Agreement between Ontario and Canada on Environmental and Impact Assessment (https://www.canada.ca/en/impact-assessment-agency/corporate/acts-regulations/legislation-regulations/canada-on-cooperation-agreement.html)” signed  on  December 15 reaffirms the need for Ontario to request a full Environmental Assessment of this project.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• 1 December 30, 2025 Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP), The Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association (LSSSRA) formal submission to the to Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks to fulfill it’s obligation to require a Full Environmental Assessment for the Georgina Island Fixed Link proposal to build a 2.6 km series of Bridges and Causeways in Lake Simcoe and an 800 m Roadway in the Greenbelt between Black River Road and to the shoreline. We are writing to object to the decision in the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) letter dated June 9, 2025 regarding the Georgina Island Fixed Link (GIFL), that the Ministry “will not be seeking designation of the project which would require it to proceed through the comprehensive environmental assessment process.” Since that time, on December 11, 2025, the “Co-operation Agreement between Ontario and Canada on Environmental and Impact Assessment” was signed and on December 15, 2025, the GIFL Detailed Project Description (DPD) was filed with IAAC. We urge the Ontario Minister and Staff to involve to the fullest extent the Ministries, departments, authorities, and staff at the various Ontario provincial government levels including the Lake Simcoe Regional Conservation Authority (LSRCA) to act upon their legal duty, to meet or exceed the Ontario legislation, regulations, policies, guidelines and standards. We take exception and object to the Ministry’s June 2025 decision NOT to require a full Environmental Assessment for the 2.6 km Fixed Link between Georgina Island and the mainland. The Lake Simcoe Regional Conservation Authority (“LSRCA”), the Lake Simcoe ...

Signaler

Attachment Request to IAAC for a full Environmental Assessment

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association
• Numéro de référence : 106
• Présenté : 2025-12-30 12 h 27
• Phase du projet : Planification
• The Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association is requesting a full and joint Impact/Environmental Assessment of the 2.6 km Fixed Link. The Georgina Island First Nations has recently filed its Detailed Project Plan and we disagree with a number of representations made and note a number of omissions in the DPD.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• 1 December 30, 2025 IAAC Project Manager File 83539 The Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association formal submission post DPD, filing to the Impact Agency of Canada in accordance with Section 16 of the Impact Assessment Act to require an Impact Assessment for the Georgina Island Fixed Link (GIFL) proposal to build a 2.6 km Bridge and Causeway in Lake Simcoe and an 800 m Roadway on federal lands in the Greenbelt between Black River Road and the shoreline. (CIAR # 83539) The purpose of this Letter is to formally update our request for IAAC to conduct a full, complete and comprehensive Impact assessment of the Georgina Island Fixed Link. We are the Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association (“LSSSRA”) “composed of about a thousand members who are very concerned about the updated design of the 2.6 km Fixed Link, a series of a roadway, bridges and causeways in the waters of Lake Simcoe. On December 15, 2025, the Detailed Project Plan (DPD) was submitted to IAAC for the Georgina Island Fixed Link (GIFL). With the signing and announcement of the “Co- operation Agreement between Ontario and Canada on Environmental and Impact Assessment” on December 11, 2025, the duty and method was set out for the IAAC and the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) to perform a joint Environmental Assessment of the Fixed Link proposal (CIAR#83539). In the preamble to the IAAC Act, it states that “Whereas Parliament recognizes the importance of implementing the impact assessment process in a manner that ….supports coordinated action among jurisdictions that have powers, duties and functions in relation to the assessment of the effects of designated projects, and encourages the ...

Signaler

Attachment Strongly Object to any form of bridge or causeway

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Donald Ross
• Numéro de référence : 104
• Présenté : 2025-12-16 13 h 37
• Phase du projet : Planification
• It is with the deepest respect for all Indigenous Canadians that I must submit my complete opposition to the construction of ANY form of bridge or causeway on Lake Simcoe to Georgina Island.  Notwithstanding the environmental impact of such a structure over time, the mere potential COSTS of such an undertaking are beyond justifiable.  As the Federal Government works its way out of our enormous National Debt while planning to bring our defence spending to 5% of GDP in the next 10 years. Where will the money come from? The cost to build this will easily exceed $1,000,000,000 contrary to projections. Simply look at how the city of Toronto builds subways.  The ongoing operating, maintenance and repair costs  can not be supported by the several hundred residences on the island. Do the Chippewas plan to build housing to defer costs? How many houses can they build? Where will those funds come?  who pays for the the incremental infrastructure. Clearly there is another solution. An Electric Ice Breaking Ferry.  A state of the art electric or bio-diesel ferry can work seamlessly with the existing ferry.  It would more than double capacity and cut wait times in half. It will keep the water open year round. For emergencies we have Ornge Helicopters available. Build a landing pad on the island.  They fly over Georgina several times a day.  When all factors are considered the ONLY viable solution is an improved ferry system.  How many round trips to the island would a BILLION dollars buy in the form of subsidies. Maintaining a 2km bridge would cost so much more than maintaining 2 ferry's.  Surely cooler heads will prevail.  Respectfully, 

Signaler

Attachment Full Enviromental Assessment needed

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Steve Joyce
• Numéro de référence : 98
• Présenté : 2025-02-23 11 h 00
• Phase du projet : Planification
• As a resident of Georgina, I have a great concern regarding the environment impact this will have on Lake Simcoe, especially the area near the fixed link.  It will change the water flow, fish habitat, etc.  I'm not sure we have seen a great enough need for this to be built to warrant the damage that it could cause.  It certainly should not be built without a complete Environment Assessment and full investigation into alternative solutions.

Signaler

Attachment GIFL

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Georgina, Ontario & Canadian resident & taxpayer
• Numéro de référence : 97
• Présenté : 2025-02-04 12 h 22
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Questions: 1. Who & how was the hieght of the "high level bridge" section at 10 meters (as the water depth in the area approacing the prposed GIFL from the west is not that deep)?   2. Was a swing bridge ever considered as an alternative?... 3. ... or the initial & operating costs of a swing bridge considered?   4. Will there be any fees to:   (i) drive, or    (ii) walk, or   (iii) ride a bike over the GIFL to or from the island ?   Thank you  Ken Tessis  T 416.258.6394 E  kentessis@gmail.com    

Signaler

Attachment Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association Request for Impact Assessment

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Lee Simpson
• Numéro de référence : 94
• Présenté : 2024-04-29 9 h 35
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Please add this report to the IAAC – GIFL #83539 project
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association 1 of 3| P a g e Cover Letter-Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association submission Georgina Island Fixed Link Project Registry file #83539 Anjala Puvananathan, Regional Director and Project Manager File 83539 Re: The Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association formal submission to the Impact Agency of Canada to support the Agency’s Decision in accordance with Section 16 of the Impact Assessment Act to require an Impact Assessment for the Georgina Island Fixed Link proposal to build a 2.4 km Bridge and Causeway in Lake Simcoe and a 800 m Roadway on federal lands in the Greenbelt between Black River Road and the shoreline. (CIAR # 83539) Dear Ms. Punavanathen As President and on behalf of the Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association (“LSSSRA”), I offer the following attached report including information and explanation why an impact assessment under the Impact Assessment Act (the “IAA”) is (should be) required for the Georgina Island Fixed Link (“GIFL”) or (“Fixed Link”) or (“Project”). LSSSRA is a not-for-profit association that was created to address the community concerns over the proposed Georgina Island Fixed Link. We are very concerned about the environmental damage, destruction of fish habitat, impairment of marine navigation and adverse impacts to species at risk that a project of this size will have on Lake Simcoe. Our Association has the support of the community associations that will be impacted by this project as well as residents of the Town of Georgina. In total, we represent more than a thousand individuals that request an impact assessment under the Impact Assessment Act. Based on the enclosed report we support ...

Attachment Objection to a fixed link

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Cottager
• Numéro de référence : 93
• Présenté : 2024-04-11 14 h 21
• Phase du projet : Planification
• I am actively participating in the ongoing process strongly opposing a fixed link of any kind between Georgina Island and the south shore of Lake Simcoe. My comment stems from being a 63 year cottager (3rd generation) on the south shore of lake simcoe. I witnessed first hand the effects of years of the Government dumping truck loads of sand into lake Simcoe at Sibbald point.  The wave effect or 'long shore current' (look up the definition) brough so much sand around the east point of the park that it filled in 2 privately owned boat houses, shoreline and dock areas and created a new point of land. There was a law suit determining that the government was held liable. The spent millinons of dollars and most of one summer with large cranes filling truck load after truck load of sand to remediate the disturbed shoreline east of the park.  The governments solution to reduce this problem was to erect 2 x 150 stone piers or groins out into the lake. This reduced the problem but did not eliminate it. I believe they still dump sand in smaller quantities to keep the beech useable. The shore line east of the park and the lake bottom however are still always changing due to the westerly winds. The point of my comment is even notionally allowing the installation of a 2 km bridge, causeway, levy (call it whatever you like) between Sibbald Pint and Virginia Beech will so negatively disrupt the lake eco system and shoreline no amount of remediation will ever solve the problem. Erecting a bridge on piers (say Confederation Bridge) would eliminate this potential but cost billions, and as such not viable. The area west of the sauseway will fill in with silt (it ...

Signaler

Attachment Georgina Island Fixed Link Update

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Administrateur de la part de Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
• Numéro de référence : 91
• Présenté : 2024-03-04 9 h 12
• See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce ci-jointe 
• Inclus pièce jointe
• <Original signed by>

Signaler

Attachment letter re Georgina Island Fixed Link

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Administrateur de la part de Claire Malcolmson
• Numéro de référence : 92
• Présenté : 2024-03-01 12 h 30
• See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce ci-jointe 
• Inclus pièce jointe
• February 29, 2024 Impact Assessment Agency of Canada Attn: Anjala Puvananathan Email: anjala.puvananathan@iaac-aeic.gc.ca GEORGINA ISLAND FIXED LINK PROJECT 83539 Please accept this letter as a follow up to our original submission on the Initial Project Plan which we filed with the IAAC on May 27, 2022. We have been advised that the Georgina Island First Nations are intending to file their Detailed Project Description with the IAAC imminently. We have reviewed the 36 technical comments on the project completed by the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority and concur that there is a lot more work that needs to be undertaken before a project of this magnitude can proceed. We also have been participating deeply in the review of the Bradford Bypass highway and our concerns about the lake’s health and the impacts of new roads have grown. We would like to ensure that any and all future highways are dealt with in a manner that goes beyond the way the province of Ontario has streamlined Environmental Assessments. Indeed, GIFN promised best in class studies and so far the reviews have not determined that the planning for this highway meets that bar. More work is needed. Finally, as a grassroots organization, we are concerned about the project’s grassroots support. We have worked with First Nations grassroots members many times, on Lake Simcoe issues, and therefore it is important to us that this project is truly supported by its proponents. Ian Big Canoe’s letter makes clear that there is still work to be done to address the concerns of a significant portion of band members. We encourage those involved to work together to propose a path forward that will be consistent with both ...

Signaler

Attachment Georgina Island Fixed Link Project 83539

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Administrateur de la part de Ian Big Canoe Georgina Island Fire Chief
• Numéro de référence : 90
• Présenté : 2024-02-26 21 h 06
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce ci-jointe 
• Inclus pièce jointe
• February 26, 2024 Impact Assessment Agency of Canada Attn: Anjala Puvananathan Email: anjala.puvananathan@iaac-aeic.gc.ca GEORGINA ISLAND FIXED LINK PROJECT 83539 On behalf of the First Nation residents who reside on Georgina Island who oppose the bridge construction, I would like our comments to be published on the IAAC website and be shared with all decision makers as we believe this project should not be approved without a full Impact Assessment. A petition outlining these concerns has been circulating in our community since February 20, 2024. We plan to keep collecting signatures to raise awareness among Lake Simcoe stakeholders about the impacts of this project. We understand WSP intends to file a Detailed Project Plan in the near future. The Initial Project Plan that was filed with IAAC included a number of misrepresentations. We attended a meeting recently with WSP and Cambian Indigenous Professional Services (CIPS) to sell us on the reports they have prepared to submit to the IAAC. In summary the study areas presented are only a very small portion of the lake and lands that will be affected by building a 1.2 kilometer causeway. Equally concerning is our local knowledge of the lake and lands leaves us to believe that these studies are not accurate. We heard a number of responses to our questions which included responses like “we will review”, “we will mitigate", "there will be adverse environmental impacts", "measures will be taken to reduce environmental impacts", “we will compensate’, "our models show....”, and “we are still at a very preliminary stage in this long process”. As concerned citizens who have read the LSCRA’s review of the Georgina Island Fixed Link ...

Signaler

Attachment Protect Lake Simcoe

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Administrateur de la part de the Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association (LSSSRA)
• Numéro de référence : 89
• Présenté : 2023-10-04 16 h 08
• Please see the attached submission
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Protect Lake Simcoe A discussion paper outlining alternatives to the ‘Georgina Island Fixed Link Project’ and why a bridge and two causeways would be environmentally damaging to Lake Simcoe Prepared by: Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association October 2023 Protect Lake Simcoe | 2 The Proposed Project The Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation are proposing to construct and operate what they have named the “Georgina Island Fixed Link Project”. This project consists of a 3.6 km two lane 40-foot-wide roadway, including two permanent causeways, a new 1200 metre-long 65 foot high bridge and a 1 km roadway through the Greenbelt connecting the southern end of Georgina Island to the mainland in the Town of Georgina across Lake Simcoe. About the Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association The Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association (“LSSSRA”) represents several hundred residents that will be directly affected by the Georgina Island bridge and causeway project. The LSSSRA’s priority is the wellbeing of everyone who lives by the lake, including the Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation, the thousands of campers who visit the almost adjacent Sibbald Point Provincial Park, non-member residents, boaters and Lake Simcoe itself. Summary of Concerns The Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation have voiced concerns about the reliability of the existing diesel ferry used to access Georgina Island and want to improve the convenience of travel and address the need for better connectivity and safety. The LSSSRA strongly agrees there must be a reliable, safe and sustainable method of transportation to and from Georgina Island. That said, we also hold that the method of ...

Signaler

Attachment Trent Severn Waterway, Footpath and Government Should Fully Fund Causeway

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Julia Brown
• Numéro de référence : 88
• Présenté : 2022-12-30 10 h 44
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Good Afternoon, My name is Julia Brown and I am a Treaty Person.  My ancestors moved to Canada from England, Scotland and Ireland and settled on Indigenous Land.  For this reason,  I am responsbile for upholding the Treaty Rights of Indigenous Peoples, including ensuring that my Government respects those rights as well.    Many years ago, there was a stretch of land that connected the Georgina Island First Nation to the Mainland.  This allowed for Residents of the Island to pass back and forth unihibited.  When the Trent Severn Waterway was constructed, there was no Indigenous engagement.  The result of the Waterwaty was that this stretch of land became fully covered with water.  This has caused major issues with transportation for the Chippewas of Georgina Island and has resulted in isolation and health/education inequities.  The Residents are fully reliant on a ferry and, there are times of the year when they have to take ice transporation back and forth.  Often, they miss or are late for appointments as a result.  Children need to leave the Island at a certain age to go to school and must stay with people on the Mainland, away from their families.   It is my very strong belief that the Government of Canada should fully fund the construction of the causway because the need for the causeway is a result of something they did that affected the entire community. I will also write to the PM and other party leaders to advocate for this as well. Thank you for considering. Julia Brown

Signaler

Attachment I fully support a bridge from Georgina mainland to the islands

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Wendy Comer
• Numéro de référence : 87
• Présenté : 2022-10-15 16 h 35
• Phase du projet : Planification
• It seems that any improvement today should be turned away because of environmental impact.  If we keep going at this rate there will never be improvements. A bridge allows for all year access, takes the current ferries out of use, which has to positively impact the environment. I am fairly certain there will be an environmental impact should the bridge be built, but I also think due to the indigenous way of respecting and caring for the environment, the impacts will be minimal. This bridge has been a long time coming and will make the island far more accessible than it is now.  I have lived in the Keswick area for 40+ years and I have never been to the island. I fully support the building of a bridge!

Signaler

Attachment Town of Georgina - Information to inform the Summary of Issues

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Administrateur de la part de Town of Georgina
• Numéro de référence : 80
• Présenté : 2022-06-01
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Please see the attached submission.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Georgina Island Fixed Link Project Page 1 of 4 CIAR reference number: 83539 Comment Form – Information to inform the Summary of Issues Project: Georgina Island Fixed Link Project Proponent: Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation Canadian Impact Assessment Registry No.: 83539 Comments requested by: May 29, 2022 Municipality Name: Town of Georgina Primary Contact Contact Name: Ryan Cronsberry, CAO Telephone: 9054764301 Address:26557 Civic Center Road Fax (optional): Email: rcronsberry@georgina.ca; Alternative Contact (optional) Contact Name: Rob Wheater, DCAO Telephone: 9054764301 Address: Fax (optional): Email: info@georgina.ca; rwheater@georgina.ca; The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada invites your municipality to provide information it has available at this time on the Project and its potential effects or impacts (both positive and negative) to the environmental, health, social and economic conditions of your community. Your comments will inform the Summary of Issues1 with respect to the Project and will be provided to the Proponent to address. You may use this form or use another format of your choice. All comments should be submitted via the Submit a Comment feature available on the Project’s Canadian Impact Assessment Registry page (Reference 83539 at: http://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/evaluations/proj/83539?culture=en-CA). Letters and forms can be uploaded using this feature. If you have any difficulties submitting this way, please contact the Agency at GeorginaIsland-IleGeorgina@iaac-aeic.gc.ca for assistance. 1. Changes to the environment Describe how the Project could potentially cause changes to the environment that are important to your community. The Town of ...

Signaler

Attachment Georgina Island Fixed Link Project - NDMNRF Comment on Initial Project Description

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Ministry of Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources and Forestry présenté par Jeffrey Dennis
• Numéro de référence : 73
• Présenté : 2022-05-30 19 h 18
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Please find attached the Ministry of Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources and Forestry's comments on the Initial Project Description for the Georgina Island Fixed Link project. Included is the completed Provincial Advice Record and NDMNRF Provincial Comment Table (previously submitted in response to the Draft Initial Project Description). Comments may be subject to revision/addition upon supplemental review. Thank you, Jeffrey Dennis (Resource Development Planning Coordinator, NDMNRF)
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Attachment 2: Provincial Comment Table for the Georgina Island Fixed Link Project – Draft Initial Project Description (IPD) Draft IPD submitted by the Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation (the Proponent) Use this document to provide comments on the Georgina Island Fixed Link Project (the Project). The document consists of two tables: • Table 1 will enable you to describe potential project effects.1 The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (the Agency) requests detailed advice to assist the Agency in understanding whether the proponent has adequately characterized potential adverse effects of the Project and to improve the proponent’s Initial Project Description before a formal submission. Refer to prompts in the table to guide your responses. • Error! Reference source not found. will facilitate the collection of general or editorial comments. Table 1: Description of the potential effects of the Project 1 effects in this context means changes to the environment or to health, social or economic conditions and the positive and negative consequences of these changes. Comment ID Document Reference Valued Component Project Component Description of the Potential Effect (Context and Rationale) Powers, Duties and Functions Instructions to the Proponent 1 Throughout Document Document Edit General edit Please correct the Ministry of Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources and Forestry acronym to: NDMNRF. 2 Part A – General Information Page 7 Document Edit Occupational Authority Construction activities on Crown Land (including lakebed) will require a work permit under the Public Lands Act. Permanent/long term bridge footings, abutments, piers, and other ...
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Georgina Island Fixed Link Project Page 1 of 5 CIAR reference number: 83539 Provincial Advice Record – Information to Inform the Summary of Issues Project: Georgina Island Fixed Link Project Proponent: Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation CIAR No.: 83539 Response requested by: May 29, 2022 All comments should be submitted via the Submit a Comment feature available on the Project’s Canadian Impact Assessment Registry page (Reference #83539 at http://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/evaluations/proj/83539?culture=en-CA). Letters and forms can be uploaded using this feature. If you have any difficulties submitting this way, please contact the Agency at GeorginaIsland-IleGeorgina@iaac-aeic.gc.ca. 1. Confirm whether your ministry would like to participate in the federal impact assessment process for this Project. Yes No If yes, please provide contact details for the person(s) who will be working with the Agency. Ministry: Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources and Forestry Primary Contact Details: Contact Name: Jeffrey Dennis Telephone: 437-998-4004 Address: 300 Water Street, Peterborough, ON Fax: Email: Jeffrey.dennis@ontario.ca Alternate Contact Details (if applicable): Contact Name: Telephone: Address: Fax: Email: 2. Identify your ministry’s contact information for the public. This could be a generic email box or specific to your ministry’s role on the project (e.g. permits, authorizations, guidance or funding within your ministry’s mandate.) NDMNRF Aurora District Scp.aurora@ontario.ca 3. Will your ministry undertake any technical analysis (e.g. effects assessment) related to this Project? Would you be willing to cooperate with the Agency on this analysis? ...

Signaler

Attachment Georgina Island Fixed Link Project comments

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Administrateur de la part de Cora Raine
• Numéro de référence : 79
• Présenté : 2022-05-30
• Please see attached document
• Inclus pièce jointe
• 29 May 2022 Impact Assessment Agency of Canada Re: GIFN - Fixed Link Impact Assessment public consultation ending 29 May 2022 Please find these comments and information that may be useful to your considerations in the attached pdf. It includes photo observation in documentation of the significant wildlife appearing and photographed in the coastal Virginia Hamlet and local areas, along her shores and the creek mouths that drain into Lake Simcoe, and in the north half of the 115 Hadden farm field at the edge of the nine-acre coastal wetland (mouth of Virginia Creek C) at the lake. The creeks draining through Virginia Hamlet are hatcheries that feed and stock the lake. The wildlife photo pages and other pages were not purposed to this information, but I thought the info may be useful in some way so have included random excerpted pages. I don't have time to recompose and repurpose them. Virginia Hamlet and these mainland shoreline habitations are swampland marshlands by default when early settlers drained these Simcoe Lowlands to make settlements. There are significant wildlife, and vital hydrological conditions. The wildlife (foxes, turkeys, ducks and ducklings, frogs and toads can sometimes be seen walking on our street (Kay) during the day. This area is the destination for another great variety of migrating birds that nest in our trees and bushes and teach their young at the bird feeders, in the birdbaths, under the flowers and through the lawn for seeds or garden bugs. Streams of Geese and black flock specks, blue herons, Cormorants, turkey vultures fly North-South overhead morning and night, back and forth frequently in migrating seasons. This is characteristic of the environment at ...

Signaler

Attachment Examen de la description initiale de projet

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Administrateur de la part de Nation huronne-wendat
• Numéro de référence : 83
• Présenté : 2022-05-30
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• Veuillez consulter la soumission ci-jointe.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• 255, Place Chef Michel-Laveau, Wendake (Québec) G0A 4V0 Canada Téléphone : (418) 843-3767 Télécopieur : (418) 842-1108 Sans frais : 1-877-712-3767 Wendake, le 30 mai 2022 Anjala Puvananathan Directrice Région de l’Ontario Agence d’évaluation d’impact du Canada 600-55, rue York Toronto (Ontario) M5J 1R7 Objet: Projet de remplacement du pont Alexandra – Examen de la description initiale de projet La présente concerne l’objet en titre et fait suite à la lettre que vous avez adressée au Grand Chef de la Nation huronne-wendat, Monsieur Rémy Vincent, le 29 avril 2022. Tout d’abord, nous vous réitérons que le gouvernement du Canada est tenu de consulter les Autochtones, et donc notre Nation, sur l’ensemble du Nionwentsïo, lorsqu’il y a modification ou adoption d’un projet de loi, de règlement ou de politique, de même en ce qui concerne les projets de planification, d’aménagement, de développement et d’émission de baux sur le territoire, ou l’adoption de toute autre mesure susceptible d’avoir des effets sur nos droits et intérêts, et ce, tout au long du processus concerné. Cette obligation découle de plusieurs jugements de la Cour suprême du Canada en matière de consultation, tels Haïda, Taku River et Mikisew. En ce qui concerne le Projet de lien fixe de l’ile de Georgina, il s’agit d’un projet situé sur le territoire ancestral de la Nation huronne-wendat en Ontario, appelé Wendake Sud. Le projet est donc susceptible d’avoir des impacts sur les droits, activités et intérêts de la Nation. Le Bureau du Nionwentsïo porte un grand intérêt au processus d’évaluation environnementale de l’Agence et souhaite être impliqué dans toutes les étapes à venir. Nous avons ...

Signaler

Attachment Ref. 8353 GIFL

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Eija Pietila
• Numéro de référence : 72
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 23 h 59
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• I do understand that the Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation need to have a safe reliable access from Georgina Island to the Mainland. An improved infrastructure transportation availability will be beneficial in their daily activities of living.  Unfortunately any structural change in the Lake will have consequences with the Environmental and Ecological Health of the Lake and surrounding watershed. It will have a direct effect on water quality,water flow, and natural habitats of fish and wildlife.  It is imperative that Impact Assessment of Canada and all environmental agencies do a  transparent through assessment and mitigation of the GIFL project. The study area should go from Sibbald Point  to Duclos Point as I feel this area will also be impacted by the building of the GIFL.  With new advancements in technology and engineering perhaps alternative solutions could be investigated like electric ferries, ice breakers and construction methods of bridges. Let’s find the best solution for the health of Lake Simcoe and the access Georgina Island residents need.             

Signaler

Attachment Have Alternatives to a Fixed Link Been Meaningfully Explored?

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Adam Lawson
• Numéro de référence : 71
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 23 h 49
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• Access to the island year-round, especially for medical services, is a problem that needs a solution. But outside of the environmental concerns (which I expect will be investigated), it is not clear that replacing or improving the existing ferry and ice road operations is not a sufficient or proportional fix. The Project Team appears to mischaracterize other alternatives. At an October 5, 2021 public meeting, the Project Team rejected that a “greener” icebreaker ferry (that can be used all year long) was feasible, stating a Health Impact Assessment "identifies the fixed link as the only solution to effectively meet the health and safety issues" posed by a lack of year-round access.(Summary of an Initial Project Description of a Designated Project, pg. 19 PDF). But the Health Impact Assessment (HIA) does not make such a claim, noting that "the HIA does not focus on alternatives to the current transportation options but rather discusses the health impacts due to current transportation options." (Initial Project Description, pg. 1389 PDF, emphasis added). The HIA report states that the health and well-being of members of the GIFN community face negative impacts as the current Ferry is aging, it has climbing repair and maintenance costs, the ice road season is reducing, and the Scoot/Airboat may not be reliable or appropriate. (pg 1392). But the HIA does not say the fixed link is the "only solution", instead concluding potential improvements include "adding new instrastructure, replacing old infrastructure or considering other options such as a bridge" (emphasis added). It goes on to state ...

Signaler

Attachment Georgina Island Fixed Link Project

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Patrick Hansford
• Numéro de référence : 70
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 22 h 21
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• Doesn't seem like anyone has spent much time looking at alternatives, A "Fixed link" is described as "i.e., a bridge and a causeway" according to the Project Overview. However, A "Bridge", and a "Bridge and a Causeway" are two of the four alternatives? PG 25 also states that "Option A) doing nothing" is one way "to meet the need for the Project and achieve its purpose". Why is this even a conversation?. But sure, let's just burn more money. On behalf of the McRae Beach Association, which membership includes approximately 150 residential homes and cottages, we would like to state our unanimous objection to the proposed Fixed Link project, and hereto file our comments.   We believe that there will be significant ecological and environmental repercussions should this Fixed Link be allowed to be constructed as presented. The McRae Beach Association, in agreement with the Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association (LSSSRA), urges Impact Assessment of Canada, the Minister and staff at Environment Canada to require a full and complete Environmental Assessment.  We are also concerned that very few alternatives to the proposed Fixed Link were properly researched or presented. It is important in a project of this size with so many environmental concerns and stakeholders involved, that all viable alternatives be properly researched, presented and assessed in advance of any decision.   

Signaler

Attachment Not the solution

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : E Mortson
• Numéro de référence : 69
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 21 h 51
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• I am very concerned about the negative impacts that this bridge will have on Lake Simcoe. Many of those that have commented here have raised the environmental impacts of the bridge, which are valid, I’m also concerned about the environmental impacts from the commercialization of the island that will occur if the GIFL is built. This has not been mentioned in any of the materials. Also, the assessment being considered here doesn’t account for the multiple projects being built on the shores of lake simcoe and the cumulative impacts they will have.  Unfortunately, public outreach for this initiative seems to be under the radar and many residents are unaware of it. More time is required to : - properly weigh the options and if the scale of the funding for this project is properly being put to use given there are greener options that can provide safer access - ensure correct public outreach has occurred with all residents and businesses  - 360 environmental assessments which factor in all lake simcoe projects, including impacts of future commercialization of the island  Thank you for your time. I look forward to hearing next steps to address everyone's concerns.   

Signaler

Attachment Concern Regarding Fixed Link Bridge

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Julie Boarder
• Numéro de référence : 68
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 19 h 23
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• As a resident of McRae Beach, I have a great concern regarding the environment impact this will have on Lake Simcoe, especially the area near the fixed link.  It will change the water flow, fish habitat, etc.  I'm not sure we have seen a great enough need for this to be built to warrant the damage that it could cause.  It certainly should not be built without a complete Environment Assessment and full investigation into alternative solutions. Julie Boarder Blue Heron Drive

Signaler

Attachment Strong opposed to the Fixed Link being built

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Stephanie Finch
• Numéro de référence : 67
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 19 h 19
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• I believe that there will be significant ecological and environmental issues should the proposed Fixed Link be built as presented. As a recent property owner in the area I am concerned of the impact this Fixed Link will have in decreasing our property value by defalt of this project being built without a proper full and complete Environmental Assessment. It's important that alternative solutions are investigated properly - let's look into the cost of a green energy ferry to replace the current end of lifespan ferry, instead of building a permanent structure spanning across our beautiful lake.

Signaler

Attachment Stop, Protect the Water, More Research First

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Thanesh Yoga
• Numéro de référence : 66
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 18 h 51
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• As a full-time resident on Lake Simcoe, I object to the development of a permanent structure over Lake Simcoe without broader research, collobration and planning involving impacted stakeholders first. I am concerned about any permanent structure over and/or on the water that would impact the health and safety of residents, wildlife, and the lake water itself. A permanent structure would restrict water flow, jeopardize drinking water drawn from the lake, create noise and light pollution, and possibly create conditions leading to swampy, dirty water in areas around the structure is dangerous. I feel there are alternatives to improving committing  between Georgina Island and the mainland. These should be explorered first and evaluated among the costs, risks and benefits related to this proposal  I propose that a full environmental impact study be conducted and disseminated to Lake Simcoe residents before any decisions are made to approve the proposed Georgina Island Link Project. All residents are affected by any such decision and should be fully consulted as this will impact health of life, quality of life and potentially economic ramifications that will be profound. More importantly, we need to stop and pause to protect the natural life that has been flourishing at Lake Simcoe. 

Signaler

Attachment Proposed Fixed Link Project

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Maria Vlachos
• Numéro de référence : 65
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 18 h 25
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• I am a full time resident of Lake Simcoe and I objext to the propsed Fixed LInk project. I believe there to be significant ecological and environmental concerns to be adressed. I am in agreement with the LSSSRA and urge the Impact Assessment of Canada, the MInister and Environmental canada to participate in a full environmental assessment. Proper research must be done and presented to all concerned before any decision is made.   thank you . Maria Vlachos  6 Blue Heron Drive  Pefferlaw Ont.

Signaler

Attachment Georgina Island Fixed Link Project Proposal

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Alannah David-Clark
• Numéro de référence : 64
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 18 h 12
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• Prior to the development of the Trent-Severn Waterway the water level on Lake Simcoe was low enough to enable residents to cross in wagons or walk in ankle-deep water to the mainland at Virginia beach, reference from "Lake Simcoe Water levels," Lake Simcoe Region Conversation Authority. August 2013.   This has also been documented in numerous history books about the area. I agree an environmental assessment needs to be conducted and shared prior to changing the lake however I have to wonder what assessments or considerations were given to the people of Georgina island prior to the lake being artificially raised.  Proper access to the mainland is needed not the current band aid solution for an aged ferry which doesn't run 24 hours a day.  

Signaler

Attachment Georgina Island Fixed Link - a comprehensive full impact assessment is needed.

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Michael Burns
• Numéro de référence : 63
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 17 h 50
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• What would be the cost of the Georgina Island Fixed Link to the health of Lake Simcoe? That is one of the most important question and it seems that no effort is being made to find the answer.   The potential environmental impacts mentioned in the Initial Project Description are only for the 'study area' and that study area only covers the area of the construction itself when in fact this is a massive project with potentially wide reaching impacts.   According to the description the link would consist of 'two permanent causeways, each with a continuous length of 500 to 1000 metres' plus a bridge. So put another way there would one to two kilometers of lake obstructed by this link. This could have extensive harmful effects on the lake to the east of the link - an area already under significant environmental stress. How can this barrier not affect the flow of the lake's waters into the area?   What would that mean to the water quality? To fishing? Swimming? Boating? What would it mean to the home and cottage owners in the area and indeed to the whole south eastern shore of Georgina Island itself. This is over 12 square kilometers of Lake Simcoe that could be ruined.   A full and comprehensive impact assessment must be done.   Others have suggested that perhaps a new environmentally friendly ferry equipped to handle the winter ice would be a better solution. This makes sense. Let's not forget that the same global warming that makes the winter ice road less viable makes it easier to run a ferry all year. In general the length of time the current ferry can't run has been getting ...

Signaler

Attachment Also a McRae Beach Resident

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Chris Sloan
• Numéro de référence : 62
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 17 h 35
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• I note with interest the statement submitted by the McRae Beach Association in opposition to the GIFN fixed link. I am a resident of McRae Beach and I support the proposed fixed link and I know others on the beach who also support it. The claim of "unanimous" opposition is therefore untrue. I note that the main concern for the Association seems to be for the environment and health of the lake. I'm glad to hear it, because of all the other numerous issues facing the health of our lake, the Association to my knowledge has been remarkably silent. It seems that the environment and health of the lake is only important in certain, specific situations - like when it might also affect a sunset view. In light of this, it is a disappointing position for the Association to take. For my own part, if we are to live up to the slogan that "every child matters" and if we have any hope of fulfilling the T&RC's 99 Calls to Action, it is time we start listening to our FN neighbors when they express a need. If lives can be saved in winter, if economic and social impacts can be improved for my FN neighbors, then I will learn to live with an altered view. I know that the GIFN remains committed to its stewardship and respect and care for the health of their traditional waters as they undertake this project. For too long, we have dictated to our FN neighbors where and how they should live. It's time we started listening to them for a change. 

Signaler

Attachment Say NO to GIFL

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Mark Sager
• Numéro de référence : 61
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 16 h 36
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• 1.As you know, sadly the Lake Simcoe ECOSYSTEM will be negatively impacted by a fixed link to Georgina Island. 2. The fixed link will cause stagnant water by blocking the wave action and water currents from the West.This will produce a TERRIBLE SMELL on the lake. 3.The beautiful view of THE SUNSET and THE OPEN LAKE will be blocked for everyone to the South East of THE GIFL.   4. The correct solution for transporting people in cars in winter in this situation is an ELECTRIC zero emission icebreaking FERRY BOAT which is in use at the present time at the Toronto ISLAND AIRPORT and in many other places in Ontario. This can replace the existing ferry. This is safer then driving across the GIFL in Winter This is MUCH MORE environmentally friendly then the GIFL This is available at A FRACTION OF THE COST of GIFL SINCERELY MARK SAGER MD

Signaler

Attachment Fixed Link Project Lake Simcoe

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : Susan Lawson
• Numéro de référence : 60
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 16 h 34
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• I believe there will be significant ecological and environmental repercussions should this Fixed Link be allowed to be constructed as presented.  Very few alternatives were properly researched or presented. It is important that all stakeholders involved are consulted and that ALL viable alternatives be properly researched, presented and assessed in advance of any decision. Thank you for taking our concerns seriously. Susan Lawson

Signaler

Attachment McRae Beach Association Objection to proposed Fixed Link Project

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : McRae Beach Association présenté par Jane Kidner
• Numéro de référence : 59
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 16 h 34
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• On behalf of the McRae Beach Association, which membership includes approximately 150 residential homes and cottages, we would like to state our unanimous objection to the proposed Fixed Link project, and hereto file our comments.   We believe that there will be significant ecological and environmental repercussions should this Fixed Link be allowed to be constructed as presented. The McRae Beach Association, in agreement with the Lake Simcoe South Shore Residents Association (LSSSRA), urges Impact Assessment of Canada, the Minister and staff at Environment Canada to require a full and complete Environmental Assessment.  We are also concerned that very few alternatives to the proposed Fixed Link were properly researched or presented. It is important in a project of this size with so many environmental concerns and stakeholders involved, that all viable alternatives be properly researched, presented and assessed in advance of any decision.  Thank you for taking our concerns seriously.   Jane Kidner, McRae Beach Association President 

Signaler

Attachment Georgina Island Fixed Link Project Proposal (ref #83539)

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : McRae Beach Owners Association présenté par Linda Gross
• Numéro de référence : 58
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 15 h 25
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• As a full-time resident on Lake Simcoe, I am concerned about any permanent structure on/over the water that would impact the health and safety of residents, wildlife and fish, and the lake water itself. Any permanent structure that would not only obstruct the view on the lake, but would restrict water flow, jeopardize drinking water drawn from the lake, create noise and light pollution, and possibly create conditions leading to swampy, dirty water in areas around the structure is unacceptable ... especially as there are other more affordable and less disruptive alternatives to improving connectivity between Georgina Island and the mainland. For example, one would expect that replacing the current ferry with perhaps two or three ferries would be cheaper and more environmentally friendly than any proposed permanent structure.    I propose that a full environmental impact study be conducted and disseminated to Lake Simcoe residents before any decisions are made to approve the proposed Georgina Island Link Project. All residents are affected by any such decision and should be fully consulted. It's not just about how this will impact surrounding property values, business investment or our enjoyment of the lake. It's about the very life of our lake.

Signaler

Attachment Commentaire supprimé par l'administrateur en raison d'une cause administrative

• Projet de lien fixe de l'île Georgina
• Auteur : JC Waller
• Numéro de référence : 57
• Présenté : 2022-05-29 14 h 30
• Phase du projet : Planification
• Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de la description de projet
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.
• Inclus pièce jointe
• Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe pour afficher le contenu.