Rook I Project

Comment Search Mobile

Comment Search

Skip to filters

34 results

Attachment From The Clearwater River Dene Nation to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS

  • Rook I Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Clearwater River Dene Nation
  • Reference number: 81
  • Submitted: 2022-12-20
  • Participation notice: Public Comment Period on NexGen's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rook I Project
  • From The Clearwater River Dene Nation to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS
  • Attachment included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment included
  • CLEARWATER RIVER DENE NATION – TREATY 8 P.O. Box 5050, La Loche, Saskatchewan S0M 3H0 PHONE: (306)822-2021 FAX: (306)822-2022 1 November 11, 2022 Nicole Frigault Environmental Assessment Specialist, Technical Support Branch Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission RE: Nexgen Rook I Project Information Request Hello Nicole, Please find Clearwater River Dene Nation (CRDN) leadership approved Information Requests (IRs) below: Engagement Under section 4.1 Indigenous Engagement table 4.1-1: Summary of Primary Indigenous Group Key Engagement Activities, how is CRDN defined? Is the correspondence, meetings, joint working group, site tours data coming directly through engagement with Chief and Council members only? Or does this include CRDN leadership and community members? If community members are included, at what level? Treaty members? Local members? Community members that are considered hunters, trappers, gatherers and/or environmental advocates? On page 78, the job descriptions are identified within community, but they are not categorized with attached numbers/data. • Need to host a working group to discuss topics including but not limited to Socio- economic, community well-being, and employment Section 4.1 Indigenous Engagement Data requires more demographical categorization, e.g., special groups, trappers, hunters, gatherers, knowledge keepers, Elders, environmental community advocates, educators, local business owners, local cabin owners, etc. • Adapt to include more demographic information in all community engagement aspects/participate in the survey collection, interviews, and workshops. This could help determine any real gaps in all types and methods of ...

Report

Attachment From Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS

  • Rook I Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation
  • Reference number: 77
  • Submitted: 2022-10-28
  • Project phase: Impact Assessment
  • Participation notice: Public Comment Period on NexGen's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rook I Project
  • From Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS
  • Attachment included
  • October 28, 2022 Nicole Frigault Environmental Assessment Specialist Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) [via email: rook1@cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca] Dear Ms. Frigault, Re: Comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Rook 1 Project, proposed by NexGen Energy Ltd On behalf of the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN), the Dene Lands and Resource Management (DLRM) is writing to provide comments to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) on the draft Environmental Impact Status (“EIS”) for the Rook 1 Uranium Mining Project (“the Project”), submitted by NexGen Energy Ltd. As described by the CNSC1, the public comment period gives Indigenous nations and others “an opportunity to submit their views in writing to the CNSC on the adequacy of the information presented in the EIS”, as measured against the 2012 CEAA Guidelines for Preparation of an Environmental Assessment. Please accept this letter and the appended technical reviews as ACFN’s formal submission of comments on the adequacy of information in the draft EIS. Background on ACFN Rights and Interests ACFN has historically used all parts of their Treaty 8 area for a range of cultural practices that have been integral to its physical and cultural survival. The use of those lands for these purposes is extremely important to ACFN. The land sustains ACFN and is at the heart of their culture, traditions, identity, spirituality, and rights. ACFN members are very concerned with ensuring the continuation of their culture and see the land as central to their ability to do so; for example, in the following quote, R. Cardinal explains how “traditional ...
  • Attachment included
  • ACFN Technical Review of NexGen Rook 1 Uranium Mine Application Technical Review of NexGen Rook 1 Uranium Mine Application Contents Appendix A: Aqua Environmental Associates (AEA) ..................................................... 3 Appendix B Thompson Aquatic ................................................................................. 15 Appendix C: Integrated Toxicology Solutions ............................................................ 26 Appendix D: Management and Solutions in Environmental Science (MSES) ................. 38 Appendix D (Continued): Management and Solutions in Environmental Science (MSES) .............................................................................................................................. 43 Appendix D: Internal review conducted by ACFN’s Dene Lands and Resource Management (DLRM) .............................................................................................. 54 Appendix A 2 Aqua Environmental Associates (AEA) Appendix A: Aqua Environmental Associates (AEA) Hydrology technical review of NexGen Rook 1 Uranium Mine Application Appendix A 3 Aqua Environmental Associates (AEA) Appendix A: Aqua Environmental Associates (AEA) Hydrology technical review of NexGen Rook 1 Uranium Mine Application By: Martin Carver (AEA) Overarching Comments / General Concerns The EIS hydrology and climate-change components contain data and assessment gaps and methodological deficiencies that likely mean EIS effects assessments are unreliable and may underestimate potential effects. Shortcomings in methods involve ...

Report

Attachment From Metis Nation of Saskatchewean to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS

  • Rook I Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Metis Nation of Saskatchewan
  • Reference number: 76
  • Submitted: 2022-10-19
  • Project phase: Impact Assessment
  • Participation notice: Public Comment Period on NexGen's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rook I Project
  • From Metis Nation of Saskatchewean to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS
  • Attachment included
  • 1 Métis Nation – Saskatchewan (MN-S) Suite 201, 208-19th St W. Saskatoon, SK S7M 5X8 (phone)306-343-8285 (email) metisnationsk.com October 19, 2022 Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 280 Slater Street, P.O. Box 1046, Station B Ottawa, ON K1P 5S9 Attention: Nicole Frigault, Environmental Assessment Specialist By email: rook1@cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca To the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, Re: NexGen Rook 1 Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement: Written Intervention from the Métis Nation of Saskatchewan The Métis Nation – Saskatchewan (“MN-S”), including in respect of Métis Nation – Saskatchewan Northern Region II, is providing the enclosed feedback with respect to the draft Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) for the Rook 1 Project (the “Project”) submitted by NexGen Energy Ltd. (“NexGen”). History of the Métis To begin, we would like to acknowledge that the land on which our people live is the traditional and current territory and Homeland of the Métis (the “Homeland”). The Métis emerged as a distinct Indigenous people and nation in the historic Canadian Northwest during the 18th and 19th centuries. Saskatchewan is a part of the “historic Métis homeland”, which includes the three prairie provinces, Ontario, British Columbia, the Northwest Territories, and the northern United States. The Canadian government attempted to extinguish the historic Métis Nation through the issuance of “scrip” and land grants in the late 19th and 20th centuries. The Métis in Saskatchewan began organizing to address issues of Métis land rights and scrip in the 1930s and continued to grow and advocate for recognition as one of Canada’s Aboriginal peoples. Now, nearly 150 years ...

Report

Attachment From Birch Narrows Dene Nation to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS

  • Rook I Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Birch Narrows Dene Nation
  • Reference number: 73
  • Submitted: 2022-10-12
  • Project phase: Impact Assessment
  • Participation notice: Public Comment Period on NexGen's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rook I Project
  • From Birch Narrows Dene Nation to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS
  • Attachment included
  • NexGen Rook I Uranium Mine – Environmental Impact Statement Technical Review October 12, 2022 Submitted by: Birch Narrows Dene Nation TABLE OF CONTENTS | i Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Birch Narrows Dene Nation .......................................................................................................... 2 2.0 NexGen Rook I Project ................................................................................................. 4 3.0 Community Input ........................................................................................................ 7 4.0 Review of Rook I ......................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Cultural Heritage, Indigenous Knowledge and Land Use .............................................................. 8 4.2 Economy and Community Wellbeing .......................................................................................... 14 4.3 Water Resources ......................................................................................................................... 25 4.4 Aquatic Resources ....................................................................................................................... 45 4.5 Wildlife and Terrestrial Ecology .................................................................................................. 55 4.6 Human and Ecological Risk Assessment ..................................................................................... 61 4.7 Air Quality and Emissions ...

Report

Attachment From the Canadian Environmental Law Association to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS

  • Rook I Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Canadian Environmental Law Association
  • Reference number: 74
  • Submitted: 2022-10-12
  • Project phase: Impact Assessment
  • Participation notice: Public Comment Period on NexGen's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rook I Project
  • From the Canadian Environmental Law Association to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS
  • Attachment included
  • Canadian Environmental Law Association T 416 960-2284 • F 416 960-9392 • 55 University Avenue, Suite 1500 Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2H7 • cela.ca SUBMISSION BY THE CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ASSOCIATION TO THE CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION REGARDING THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR NEXGEN ENERGY LTD.’S PROPOSED ROOK I PROJECT CEAA Reference Number: 80171 Prepared by: Sara Libman, Legal Counsel Luc Lance Dr. Robert Patrick October 12, 2022 CELA Intervention - Canadian Environmental Law Association T 416 960-2284 • F 416 960-9392 • 55 University Avenue, Suite 1500 Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2H7 • cela.ca 2 CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS................................................................................................................................................ 4 I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 5 II. INTEREST AND EXPERTISE OF THE INTERVENOR ............................................................................ 5 III. BACKGROUND/FACTS................................................................................................................................... 6 A. PROJECT ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 B. SCOPE OF REVIEW ............................................................................................................................................ 7 IV. LEGAL FINDINGS & ANALYSIS ...

Report

Attachment From Ya'thi Néné Lands and Resources to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS

  • Rook I Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Ya'thi Néné Lands and Resources
  • Reference number: 75
  • Submitted: 2022-10-12
  • Project phase: Impact Assessment
  • Participation notice: Public Comment Period on NexGen's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rook I Project
  • From the Ya’thi Néné Lands and Resources to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS
  • Attachment included
  • 1 NexGen EIS Review – Primary Areas of Concern From Ya’thi Néné Lands and Resources (YNLR) Overview: YNLR is a not-for-profit organization established by the Black Lake Denesųłiné First Nation, Fond du Lac Denesųłiné First Nation, and Hatchet Lake Denesųłiné First Nation (collectively known as Athabasca Denesųłiné) and the municipalities of Camsell Portage, Uranium City, Stony Rapids and Wollaston Lake. YNLR has the authority to represent the communities in this EIS regulatory process. NexGen is proposing to develop an underground uranium mine at the Rook 1 project site located within Nuhenéné, the traditional territory of the Athabasca Denesųłiné (AD), near Patterson Lake. YNLR’s mission is to protect the lands and waters of Nuhenéné for the long-term benefit of its Denesųłiné First Nations and Athabasca communities, guided by their knowledge, traditions, and ambitions, while being a respected partner in relations with industries, governments, and organizations who seek to develop its resources. Background and Critical Issue: NexGen began engaging with communities as early as 2013. Unfortunately, discussions with the Athabasca Denesųłiné did not begin until 2019. Based on the early engagement, primary communities that were deemed most likely affected by the proposed Project were identified. Then using these identified communities as a guide, a LPA (local priority area) was established. NexGen engagement activities were focused on primary communities in the LPA. This approach has at least three flaws.  First, it ignores or disregards the information provided by the Athabasca Denesųłiné in 2020 that clearly demonstrates their rights and interests in the vicinity of Rook 1. ...

Report

Attachment From the Saskatchewan Environmental Society to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS

  • Rook I Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Saskatchewan Environmental Society
  • Reference number: 72
  • Submitted: 2022-10-11
  • Project phase: Impact Assessment
  • Participation notice: Public Comment Period on NexGen's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rook I Project
  • From the Saskatchewan Environmental Society to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS
  • Attachment included
  • Comments to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission regarding: NexGen Energy Ltd.’s Rook 1 Environmental Impact Statement Prepared by Ann Coxworth, Bert Weichel and Jan Norris, representing the Saskatchewan Environmental Society Submitted to the CNSC: 12 October 2022 CONTACT INFORMATION: Saskatchewan Environmental Society PO Box 1372 Saskatoon SK S7K 3N9 info@environmentalsociety.ca 306.665.1915 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 1. Concerns about the scope of the Environmental Assessment…………………………………………..1 2. Tailings management…………………………………………………………………………………………….3 2.a) Experience with deep underground storage………………………………………………...……..3 2.b) Preparation of the UGTMF cells……………………………………………………………………...…4 2.c) Adaptive management and long-term groundwater contamination………………………...4 3. Greenhouse gas emissions…………………………………………………………………………………..….5 3.a) Off-site emissions…………………………………………………………………………………….…….5 3.a.1) Transportation………………………………………………………………………………...…….5 3.a.2) Cement binder production……………………………………………………………….……..6 3.a.3) Power generation……………………………………………………………….……………..…..6 3.a.4) Cumulative effects………………………………………………………………………….……..6 3.b) Carbon offsets……………………………………………………………….……………………………..6 3.c) Achieving national and provincial targets…………………………………………………….……..7 3.d) Climate change predictions and risk evaluation …………………………………………………..7 4. Water quality: Thresholds for radionuclides…………………………………………………….……..……..8 5. Project infrastructure design and operation………………………………………………..……….………8 5.a) Site water use and ...

Report

Attachment From Buffalo River Dene Nation to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS

  • Rook I Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Buffalo River Dene Nation
  • Reference number: 70
  • Submitted: 2022-10-06
  • Updated: 2022-10-13 - 1:19 PM
  • Rationale: Comment updated for administrative purposes
  • Project phase: Impact Assessment
  • Participation notice: Public Comment Period on NexGen's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Rook I Project
  • From Buffalo River Dene Nation to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I draft EIS
  • Attachment included
  • Buffalo River Dene Nation Band No 398 Box 40 Dillon, Sask S0M 0S0 October 4, 2022 To Nicole Frigault, The following is a letter of support from the Buffalo River Dene Nation (BRDN) to be included in the formal federal draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) public review for NexGen’s Rook I Project. BRDN and NexGen have a long history of engagement and collaboration together, with relationships being developed with BRDN community and leadership as far back as 2016. From engagement during exploration, through the Study Agreement (SA), and most recently the implementation of the Impact Benefit Agreement (IBA) for the Rook I Project, NexGen has been diligent in their engagement activities. They have ensured that all programs were well defined and well communicated, and consistently demonstrate their commitment to working in partnership with BRDN to continue to develop and support community programs and initiatives that focus on culture, education, career training, and building economic capacity for long term community benefits. Study Agreement Among the many engagement initiatives that NexGen has undertaken, the establishment of the SA between NexGen and BRDN commenced in September of 2019, and serves as an impactful demonstration of NexGen’s commitment to engaging with the local Indigenous communities. The SA, fully funded by NexGen, defined a collaborative approach to identifying potential impacts of the proposed development and operations of the mine, as well as identifying potential avoidance and accommodation measures in relation to the Rook I Project. As part of the SA, a Joint Working Group (JWG) was established to support the inclusion of BRDN’s traditional knowledge throughout the EA ...

Report

Attachment Disposition Table of Public and Indigenous Groups' Comments on Project Description - Rook I Project Tableau des réponses aux commentaires du public et des groupes autochtones sur la description du projet Rook I

  • Rook I Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 9
  • Submitted: 2019-12-12
  • Disposition Table of Public and Indigenous Groups' Comments on Project Description - Rook I Project
  • Attachment included
  • Disposition Table of Public and Indigenous Groups’ Comments on Project Description – Rook I Project E-Doc: 6001783 Page 1 Item # Source Number Comment Excerpts (all original submissions can be found on the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry, reference #80171) CNSC Response 1. Ya’thi Néné Lands and Resource (YNLR) YNLR-1 Many Athabasca Basin community members are traditional land users that rely on hunting, fishing and trapping to support their families and communities. Protection of the ecological systems that support traditional land use is critical. The sustainable and responsible use of water resources should be a top priority for NexGen when operating the Rook I Project site. Residents use the multiple lakes, ponds, and rivers for a variety of purposes and highly value the environmental protection of water. Community members will want to be assured that water resources are safe and respected. All efforts should be made to design a water management system that minimizes fresh water intake by reusing and recycling water on-site whenever possible. Additionally, it is important to closely monitor groundwater and the release of effluent from any site related activity back into the environment. Effluent must be properly treated and tested before release. All monitoring results should be made available and regularly reviewed with Athabasca Basin communities. The Underground Tailings Management Facility will be a topic of interest for members of the Athabasca Basin, as tailings management methods can pose significant environmental concerns. Ya’thi Néné looks forward to learning more about the proposed tailings management facility of the Rook I Project ...
  • Attachment included
  • Tableau des réponses aux commentaires du public et des groupes autochtones sur la description du projet Rook I E-Doc: 6001783 Page 1 Point Source Numéro Extraits des commentaires (toutes les présentations originales se trouvent dans la référence no 80171 du Registre canadien d’évaluation d’impact) Réponse de la CCSN 1. Ya’thi Néné Lands and Resource (YNLR) YNLR-1 De nombreux résidents des collectivités du bassin d’Athabasca sont des usagers traditionnels de la terre qui dépendent de la chasse, de la pêche et du piégeage pour subvenir aux besoins de leur famille et de leur collectivité. La protection des systèmes écologiques qui favorisent l’utilisation des terres à des fins traditionnelles revêt une importance capitale. L’utilisation durable et responsable des ressources en eau devrait être un objectif prioritaire de NexGen dans le cadre de son exploitation de l’installation du projet Rook I. Les résidents utilisent un grand nombre de lacs, d’étangs et de rivières pour une foule de raisons et à ce titre, ils accordent une grande importance à la protection environnementale des ressources en eau. Les membres de la collectivité voudront obtenir des assurances que leurs ressources en eau sont sauvegardées et respectées. Il ne faudrait ménager aucun effort pour concevoir un système de gestion de l’eau qui minimise la captation de l’eau douce et favorise la réutilisation et le recyclage de l’eau sur place dans toute la mesure du possible. En outre, il importe de surveiller étroitement l’eau souterraine et les rejets dans l’environnement d’un effluent provenant d’une activité du projet. Les effluents doivent subir un traitement pertinent et faire l’objet d’analyse ...

Attachment From Dene Lands and Resource Management to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I Project Description From Dene Lands and Resource Management to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I Project Description

  • Rook I Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 7
  • Submitted: 2019-07-26
  • From Dene Lands and Resource Management to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I Project Description (French Only)
  • Attachment included
  • July 26, 2019 From: Rose Ross (Dene Lands and Resource Management (DLRM)) To: Nicole Frigault, Environmental Assessment Specialist Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission By email: cnsc.ea-ee.ccsn@canada.ca NexGen Energy Ltd. Rook I Project CEAA Reference Number: 80171 Hello Nicole, Please find the attached submission containing comments on the NexGen Energy Ltd. Project Description from the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN) Dene Lands and Resource Management (DLRM) office on behalf of the ACFN. Best regards, Rose Ross mailto:cnsc.ea-ee.ccsn@canada.ca <Personal Information Redacted> <Personal Information Redacted> <Personal Information Redacted><Personal Information Redacted> DLRM - NextGen Public Comments - July 26, 2019 2019 July 26 re Submission Letter to CNSC_
  • Attachment included
  • July 26, 2019 From: Rose Ross (Dene Lands and Resource Management (DLRM)) To: Nicole Frigault, Environmental Assessment Specialist Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission By email: cnsc.ea-ee.ccsn@canada.ca NexGen Energy Ltd. Rook I Project CEAA Reference Number: 80171 Hello Nicole, Please find the attached submission containing comments on the NexGen Energy Ltd. Project Description from the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN) Dene Lands and Resource Management (DLRM) office on behalf of the ACFN. Best regards, Rose Ross mailto:cnsc.ea-ee.ccsn@canada.ca <Personal Information Redacted> <Personal Information Redacted> <Personal Information Redacted><Personal Information Redacted> DLRM - NextGen Public Comments - July 26, 2019 2019 July 26 re Submission Letter to CNSC_

Attachment From Metis Nation of Saskatchewan MN-S to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I Project Description

  • Rook I Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 5
  • Submitted: 2019-07-05
  • From Metis Nation of Saskatchewan MN-S to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I Project Description
  • Attachment included
  • June 20, 2019 By E-mai l Nicole Frigault Environmental Assessment Specialist, Technical Support Branch Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission / Government of Canada Dear Nicole Frigault: Re: Comments on NexGen Energy Ltd. Project Description On behalf of Métis Nation - Saskatchewan Saskatchewan (“MNS”), I would like to thank you for reviewing our concerns set out in this letter. As you may be aware, the MNS is different from other Indigenous governments. As the democratically constituted representative for additional time and engagement through the consultation process relationship with Canada which has been documents, including the July 20, 2018 Framework Agreement for Advancing Recon between Métis Nation - Saskatchewan and Canada The MNS has, at present, significant concerns regarding the Rook I Project ( seeks to be fully engaged throughout the federal and provincial EA processes. occurring on Métis lands which are the subject of a land claim. land claim in the July 20, 2018 Framework Agreement for Advancing Reconciliation. importance of these lands to MNS than one year ago, we encourage you and the objective of achieving MNS’s consent Full engagement must also include engage with MNS Citizens on matters brought forward by NexGen Energy Ltd. (“ the Crown, and the allocation of appropriate capacity funding. Our initial comments on the Rook are below. The MNS expects to be engaged throughout this regulatory process, including through opportunities to review and reply to responses from NexGen. A. Technical Proposal under The Section 1.1 of the Project Description states that for the Environmental Assessment Act Project Description does not appear In particular we note: Environmental ...

Attachment From The Clearwater River Dene Nation to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I Project Description

  • Rook I Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 6
  • Submitted: 2019-06-01
  • From The Clearwater River Dene Nation to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I Project Description
  • Attachment included
  • June 1, 2019 From: Matthew General (The Clearwater River Dene Nation (CRDN)) To: Nicole Frigault, Environmental Assessment Specialist Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission By email: cnsc.ea-ee.ccsn@canada.ca Comments concerning the NexGen Energy Ltd. Rook I Project Description CEAA Reference number: 80171 Ms. Nicole Frigault Environmental Assessment Specialist Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Good afternoon Nicole. The Clearwater River Dene Nation (CRDN) is pleased to submit the attached comments in relation to the NexGen Rook I Project Description. With thanks, M General JFK Law For CRDN 1 Clearwater River Dene Nation Comments on Project Description NexGen Energy Ltd.'s Rook I Project May 31, 2019 2 1.0 Introduction This document provides the comments of Clearwater River Dene Nation (“CRDN”) on NexGen Energy Ltd.’s project description (the “Project Description”) for the Rook I Project (the “Project”) as requested by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (“CNSC”). The Rook I Project (Project) is a proposed new uranium mining and milling operation that is 100% owned by NexGen Energy Ltd. (NexGen). It is located adjacent to Patterson Lake in the southern Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan approximately 155 km north of the town of La Loche, 80 km south of the former Cluff Lake Mine site (currently in decommissioning) and 640 km by air north west of Saskatoon. The mineral resource basis for the proposed Project is the Arrow deposit, a land-based, 100% basement hosted high grade uranium deposit. The Project includes underground and surface facilities to support the mining and processing of ...

Attachment From Ya'thi Néné Land and Resource Office to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I Project Description

  • Rook I Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 4
  • Submitted: 2019-05-31
  • From Ya'thi Néné Land and Resource Office to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Rook I Project Description
  • Attachment included
  • May 31, 2019 From: Michael Dawe (Ya’thi Néné Land and resource Office) To: Nicole Frigault, Environmental Assessment Specialist Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission By email: cnsc.ea-ee.ccsn@canada.ca Comments concerning the NexGen Energy Ltd. Rook I Project Description CEAA Reference number: 80171 Ms. Nicole Frigault Environmental Assessment Specialist Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Attention: Nicole Frigault Attached please find a submission containing comments on the NexGen Energy Ltd. Project Description from the Ya’thi Nene Land and Resource Office. Thank You. Michael L. Dawe, M.SEM Environmental Consultant Saskatoon, SK 1 Written Submission from Ya’thi Néné Land and Resource Office In the Matter of; NexGen Energy Ltd. Rook I Project Description Garrett Schmidt Executive Director Ya’thi Néné Land and Resource Office Saskatoon, SK <Personal Information Redacted> 2 Introduction The Ya’thi Néné Land and Resource Office (Ya’thi Néné), on behalf of the Athabasca First Nations of Black Lake, Fond du Lac and Hatchet Lake, and the municipalities of Camsell Portage, Stony Rapids, Uranium City, and Wollaston Lake, have reviewed the Rook I Project, Project Description, as submitted by NexGen Energy Ltd. A summary of comments pertaining to the Project Description is contained within the document below. By participating in the Project Description review, Ya’thi Néné expects to begin building a positive and long-lasting relationship with NexGen Energy Ltd and looks forward to collaborating throughout the lifecycle of this project. Ya’thi Néné is well informed regarding resource extraction and energy ...

Date submitted Display filters

Filters

Consultation typesDisplay filters

Project phaseDisplay filters

Participation noticesDisplay filters

Date modified: