Pierre River Mine Project

Comment Search Mobile

Comment Search

Skip to filters

178 results

Attachment Letter from the Fort McKay First Nation to the Joint Review Panel regarding support to delay pre-hearing proceedings until a methodology for assessing effects to Aboriginal culture and heritage is defined through the collaborative Shell and community approach

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 243
  • Submitted: 2014-12-19
  • Letter from the Fort McKay First Nation to the Joint Review Panel regarding support to delay pre-hearing proceedings until a methodology for assessing effects to Aboriginal culture and heritage is defined through the collaborative Shell and community approach
  • Attachment included
  • Working for a Better Tomorrow Fort McKay Sustainability Department P.O. Box 10, Eagle Ridge PO Fort McMurray, Alberta T9K 2Y4 Fort McKay First Nation Our File No. INDU-0805-0604-0206 December 19, 2014 Pierre River Mine Project - Joint Review Panel Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor Place Bell Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 email: Carolyn.Dunn@ceaa-acee.gc.ca Attention: Alex Bolton, Joint Review Panel Chairman c/o Caroline Dunn, Crown Consultation Coordinator Dear Mr. Bolton: Re: Support to delay pre-hearing proceedings until a methodology for assessing effects to Aboriginal culture and heritage is defined through the collaborative Shell and community approach. The Fort McKay Sustainability Department is writing to you on behalf of the Community of Fort McKay, including the Fort McKay First Nation and the Fort McKay Métis Community with regards to Shell’s ongoing work to developing a methodology to assess the effects of development to Aboriginal culture and heritage. As part of Shell’s November 13, 2014 quarterly update to the JRP, Shell noted that it recently initiated a process of engagement with various stakeholders to solicit input on the appropriate methods for assessing effects to Aboriginal culture and heritage associated with development projects and for determining the appropriate size for the RSA to be used in an EIA for an oil sands mine. Fort McKay supports Shell’s position that it would be premature to hold a pre-hearing proceeding prior to it having worked through the process that is currently underway. With respect to developing a methodology to assess effects to Aboriginal culture and heritage, ...

Attachment Response of Department of Justice representing the federal departments to Panel's request for comments regarding issues raised by Shell Canada (see reference document 234)

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 239
  • Submitted: 2014-12-15
  • Response of Department of Justice representing the federal departments to Panel's request for comments regarding issues raised by Shell Canada (see reference document 234)
  • Attachment included
  • 1+1 Department of Justice Canada Ministere de Ia Justice Canada Security Classification : Prairie Region Region des Prairies Telephone: EPCOR Tower, 300,10423 - 101 Street, Edmonton, AB TSH OE7 Tour EPCOR, 300, 10423 rue 101, Edmonton, Fncsimile: AB TSH OE7 December 15, 2014 VIA EMAIL (Shell.Reviews@ceaa-acee.gc.ca) Pierre River Mine Joint Review Panel Secretariat 160 Elgin Street, 22"d Floor Ottawa, ON K1 A OH3 Attention: Jill Adams, Panel Manager Dear Madam: Re: Joint Review Panel - Pierre River Mine Project Reference number 59539 Internet: Our File: Notre dossier: Unclassified (780) 442-1898 (780) 495-8491 robcn .drummond@justicc.gc.ca 2523377 We represent the federal authorities (including Environment Canada, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Transport Canada, Health Canada, Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada, and Natural Resources Canada) in this matter and write in respect of the Panel' s letter of November 19, 2014 in which it requested public comments on: • Shell's recommendation that the Panel should provide a ruling as to the appropriateness of the methodologies being used in order to give guidance to Shell in the development of responses to the Round 2 supplemental information requests (R2 SIRs) The Panel noted that it may consider conducting a pre-hearing process, if it appears that there is an interest or need for such a process. The above noted federal authorities take no position on whether the Panel should provide a ruling at this stage on the appropriateness of the methodologies being used; however, they would reserve the right to make submissions on those methodologies at whatever stage of the hearing process the Panel ...

Attachment Response from the Metis Nation of Alberta Local 1909 to the Panel's request for comments regarding issues raised by Shell Canada (see reference document 234)

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 241
  • Submitted: 2014-12-15
  • Response from the Metis Nation of Alberta Local 1909 to the Panel's request for comments regarding issues raised by Shell Canada (see reference document 234)
  • Attachment included
  • Métis Nation of Alberta Association Lakeland Local Council 1909 P.O. Box 2157 Lac La Biche, AB T0A 2C0 Phone: 780.838.2331 Email: LocalPresident1909@rocketmail.com Shell PRM JRP Letter 12/12/14 1 December 15, 2014 Alex Bolton, Chair Joint Review Panel for the Pierre River Mine Project Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Place Bell Canada Ottawa, ON, K1A 0H3 Alberta Energy Regulator 9915 Franklin Avenue, Provincial Building, 2nd Floor Fort McMurray, AB, T9H K42 By email: Shell.Reviews@ceaa-acee.gc.ca Re: Absence of Métis Local 1909 rights and interests reflected in EA for Shell PRM Project (CEAA Registry Number 59539). Dear Mr. Alex Bolton, This letter is issued to the Joint Review Panel (“JRP”) in response to the November 19, 2014, Notice of Panel Request for Written Comment1 and raises several concerns with the proposed Shell Canada Energy (“Shell”) Pierre River Mine (“PRM”) Project and the related Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”). The Aboriginal rights and interests of Métis Local 1909 extend across the local and regional study areas identified in the EIS, yet this document and related information (e.g. responses to Joint Review Panel (“JRP” or “Panel”) Supplemental Information Requests (“SIRs”) from October 2013) neither make reference to our organization nor examine any potential project or cumulative effects on our Aboriginal rights and interests. The complete absence of consideration of Métis Local 1909 Aboriginal rights and interests in the EA process to date is a serious oversight in the Crown’s responsibilities towards Aboriginal peoples in Canada. Compounding this problem is the fact that neither an agent of the ...

Attachment Shell Canada's response to the Panel's request for written comments from participants regarding issues raised by Shell Canada

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 238
  • Submitted: 2014-12-15
  • Shell Canada's response to the Panel's request for written comments from participants regarding issues raised by Shell Canada
  • Attachment included
  • Page 1 of 2 December 15, 2014 Pierre River Mine Project - Joint Review Panel Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor Place Bell Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Attention: Mr. Alex Bolton – Joint Review Panel Chairman RE: Response to Notice of Panel Request for Written Comments Pierre River Mine Project Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry No. 59539 Dear Mr. Bolton: The following is Shell Canada Energy’s (“Shell”) response to the Joint Review Panel’s (“JRP”) November 19, 2014 letter, which requested written comments from interested parties regarding Shell’s proposed process to resolve methodological issues pertaining to assessment of effects to Aboriginal culture and heritage, and the sizing of a terrestrial regional study area (“RSA”), as these issues relate to the environmental impact assessment (“EIA”) for the Pierre River Mine project (“PRM”). As indicated in Shell’s November 13, 2014 quarterly update to the JRP, Shell recently initiated a process of engagement with various stakeholders to solicit input on the appropriate methods for assessing effects to Aboriginal culture and heritage associated with development projects and for determining the appropriate size for the RSA to be used in an EIA for an oil sands mine. With respect to developing a methodology to assess effects to Aboriginal culture and heritage, Shell engaged with the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (“CEA Agency”) earlier this year, and held a workshop-style meeting on November 20, 2014 in Fort McMurray, which included the participation of Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, Fort Chipewyan Métis Local 125, Fort McMurray Métis Local 1935, Fort ...

Attachment Shell Canada's response to the Non-Status Fort McMurray/Fort McKay Band and Clearwater River Band No. 175 (see reference document 235)

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 236
  • Submitted: 2014-12-12
  • Shell Canada's response to the Non-Status Fort McMurray/Fort McKay Band and Clearwater River Band No. 175 (see reference document 235)
  • Attachment included
  • Page 1 of 2 December 12, 2014 Davis LLP Suite 1201, Scotia Tower 2 10060 Jasper Avenue Edmonton AB T5J 4E5 Attention: Ms. Priscilla Kennedy RE: Shell’s Comments regarding December 5, 2014 letter provided from Davis LLP Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry No: 59539 Dear Ms. Kennedy: Shell recently became aware of the above-mentioned letter provided to the Joint Review Panel (JRP) via the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEA Agency) Registry. We submit this letter in response to the concerns you raise in your correspondence. For background, Shell has been engaging on the Pierre River Mine project (PRM) with Mr. Malcolm, as the self-identified representative of the Non-Status Fort McMurray/Fort McKay Band (NSFMFMB), since 2008. Shell co-funded an April 2008 study which included Traditional Land Use information from members of the Wood Buffalo Elders Society for use in Shell’s current oil sands applications. More recently, on August 22, 2013, Shell held an open house for the NSFMFMB at the Sawridge Hotel in Fort McMurray, during which Shell presented information regarding the Jackpine Mine Expansion project, PRM project, Shell’s environmental management process, information on Shell’s community engagement program and social investment, as well as Shell’s contracting and procurement process. This open house was attended by 10 community members; questions were primarily focused on access to employment and contracting opportunities, Shell’s social investment programs and Shell’s environmental management process. Despite prior agreement on the matter, no Elders were in attendance and no environmental consultants participated in the open ...

Attachment Letter from Fort Chipewyan Métis Local 125 to the Joint Review Panel Secretariat regarding withdrawl of objection to the Pierre River Mine Project.

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 228
  • Submitted: 2014-08-18
  • Letter from Fort Chipewyan Métis Local 125 to the Joint Review Panel Secretariat regarding withdrawl of objection to the Pierre River Mine Project.
  • Attachment included
  • Fort Chipewyan Métis Local 125 Métis Nation of Alberta PO Box 306, Fort Chipewyan Alberta T0P 1B0 Sent Via E Mail only August 18, 2014 Ms. Jill Adams Email: Shell.Reviews@ceaa-acee.gc.ca Joint Review Panel Secretariat Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Re: Shell Canada Limited Pierre River Mine Alberta Energy Regulator Application No. 1554396 Alberta Energy Regulator EPEA Application No. 001‐00245358 Water Act File No. 00245489 Dear Ms. Adams: We are writing to advise the Joint Review Panel overseeing Shell’s Pierre River Application that Shell and Fort Chipewyan Métis Local 125 (FCM) have reached an agreement to address the project-specific concerns of the FCM. As a result of this agreement, FCM supports the approval of the above-noted project and hereby withdraws its objection and statement of concern dated August 11, 2012 associated with the project and relevant applications. The FCM do not intend to participate in the hearing to consider the Pierre River Mine Project. Cc Amanda Black, AER Panel Manager Amanda.Black@aer.ca Linda Jefferson, Shell Linda.Jefferson@shell.com Sean Assie, Shell Sean.Assie@shell.com sinclairr Typewritten Text <original signed by>

Attachment McMurray Métis Withdrawal of Notice of Objection and Statement of Concern

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 227
  • Submitted: 2014-08-15
  • McMurray Métis Withdrawal of Notice of Objection and Statement of Concern
  • Attachment included
  • August 15th, 2014 Pierre River Mine Joint Review Panel Secretariat 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 1-866-582-1884 Shell.Reviews@ceaa-acee.gc.ca Alberta Energy Regulator Oil Sands and Coal Branch Suite 1000, 250 – 5 Street SW Calgary, AB T2O OR4 Email: OSB-Admin@aer.ca Re: Withdrawal of Notice of Objection and Statement of Concern for Shell Pierre River Mine Project | Alberta Energy Regulator Application No. 1554396; Alberta Energy Regulator EPEA Application No. 001- 00245359; Water Act File No. 00245489 Dear Sir/Madam, Shell Canada and the McMurray Métis have reached an agreement to address project-specific in regards to Shell Canada’s Pierre River Mine Project. As a result of this agreement, the McMurray Métis hereby withdraws its notice of objection and statement of concern filed on August 29th, 2007 as it relates to the Pierre River Mine Project and relevant applications. As well, the McMurray Métis will not be participating in the hearing process to consider the Pierre River Mine Project. Please acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience and advise our office if you require anything further. Sincerely, Kyle Harrietha General Manager, McMurray Métis CC: Jill Adams, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Amanda Black, Alberta Energy Regulator Manager, Participant Funding Program, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Linda Jefferson, Shell Canada Erica Myles, Shell Canada Gail Gallupe, President, McMurray Métis Bill Loutitt, Vice-President, McMurray Métis Salem Al-Ahmad, McMurray Métis Honourable Donald Scott, MLA, Fort McMurray-Conklin Mr. Mike Allen, MLA, Fort McMurray-Wood Buffalo Métis ...

Attachment Letter from Shell Canada Energy to the Joint Review Panel Chairman requesting a delay in the application process

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 217
  • Submitted: 2014-02-11
  • Letter from Shell Canada Energy to the Joint Review Panel Chairman requesting a delay in the application process
  • Attachment included
  • February 11, 2014 Pierre River Mine Project Joint Review Panel Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor Place Bell Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Attention: Mr Alex Bolton – Joint Review Panel Chairman RE: Pierre River Mine Project CEAR Reference Number No: 59539 Request for Delay in Application Process The purpose of this letter is twofold: first, to inform the Joint Review Panel (“JRP”) of changes in Shell’s plan for the Pierre River Mine project (“PRM” or the “Project”); and second, to respond to the submissions of parties on the adequacy of the information filed by Shell in October 2013 with respect to the Project. Shell is currently re-evaluating the timing of various asset developments with a focus on maintaining a competitive business and successful delivery of near-term growth projects. Shell has determined that it will need to adjust the development timing for PRM. Although the extent of such a change in timing is not yet known, information that has been filed in support of the Project Application, such as the Environmental Impact Assessment, may no longer be accurate and will require updates. Until the implications of these changes are understood and Shell’s evidence has been updated, Shell is not prepared to proceed to a hearing on the Project. In order to conduct a proper review and evaluation of the PRM development plans, Shell proposes that the regulatory review process for the Project be suspended, in accordance with subsections 126(6) and 44(2) of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 (“CEAA 2012”) and section 16 of Part IV of the amended JRP terms of reference (“TOR”). Shell will provide to the JRP an update on ...

Attachment From Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN) Industry Relations Corporation to Panel Secretariat re: Comments on adequacy of additional information provided by Shell Canada Limited (see Reference Document Number 191)

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 212
  • Submitted: 2014-01-17
  • From Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN) Industry Relations Corporation to Panel Secretariat re: Comments on adequacy of additional information provided by Shell Canada Limited (see Reference Document Number 191)
  • Attachment included
  • sinclairr Typewritten Text <original signed by> Technical Review of Shell Canada Energy Responses (dated October 31, 2013) to Joint Review Panel Supplemental Information Request (dated October 25, 2012) Regarding the Integrated Application for the Pierre River Mine Project PREPARED FOR: Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation Industry Relations Corporation PREPARED BY: P.M. (Patt) Larcombe, Symbion Consultants January 16, 2014 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 SIR Reference - 6............................................................................................................ 2 SIR Reference - 7............................................................................................................ 4 SIR Reference - 8............................................................................................................ 6 SIR Reference - 34c ........................................................................................................ 9 SIR Reference - 60........................................................................................................ 11 SIR Reference - 63........................................................................................................ 14 SIR Reference - 64........................................................................................................ 14 SIR Reference - ...

Attachment From Métis Nation of Alberta (MNA), Region 1 to Panel Secretariat re: Comments on adequacy of additional information provided by Shell Canada Limited (see Reference Document Number 191)

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 214
  • Submitted: 2014-01-17
  • From Métis Nation of Alberta (MNA), Region 1 to Panel Secretariat re: Comments on adequacy of additional information provided by Shell Canada Limited (see Reference Document Number 191)
  • Attachment included
  •     Together  We  Will  Continue  To  Build  A  Strong  Métis  Nation     1   Métis Nation of Alberta – Region 1 Métis Nation of Alberta Association, Region 1 1/17/14 Pierre River Mine Joint Review Panel Secretariat 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 1-866-582-1884 Fax: 613-957-0941 E-mail: Shell.Reviews@ceaa-acee.gc.ca RE: Public Comment by the Métis Nation pertaining to Shell Pierre River Mine (PRM) Project Supplemental Information Requests Shell Canada for the Pierre River Mine Oil Sands Mine Project Application and Environmental Impact Assessment Report. Dear Joint Review Panel The Métis Nation of Alberta Association Region 1 (MNA R1) is the association which represents the Métis people of Northeastern Alberta. The MNA R1 intervenes with various government agencies on behalf of members whose rights are at risk of infringement as a result of industrial development on traditional Métis territories. The Métis Nation of Alberta Association (MNA) was established in 1928. It now represents the interests of 35,000 Métis members and with 96,865 Albertans who self-identify as Métis and new membership rules coming into effect, this number will undoubtedly rise.1 The MNA is divided into six geographic zones or regions. Métis Nation of Alberta Association, Region 1 (MNAA R1) in Northeastern Alberta stretches from the Lac La Biche area to the border with the Northwest Territories. The 4,354 registered members of the MNAA R1 elect a president and vice-president to three year-terms, extending to four years in 2014. ...

Attachment From Fort McMurray Métis Local 1935 to Panel Secretariat re: Comments on adequacy of additional information provided by Shell Canada Limited (see Reference Document Number 191)

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 213
  • Submitted: 2014-01-17
  • From Fort McMurray Métis Local 1935 to Panel Secretariat re: Comments on adequacy of additional information provided by Shell Canada Limited (see Reference Document Number 191)
  • Attachment included
  • MÉTIS NATION  OF  ALBERTA  ASSOCIATION   FORT  MCMURRAY  LOCAL  COUNCIL  1935         PAGE  1  OF  12                 January  17,  2014     Pierre  River  Mine  Joint  Review  Panel  Secretariat     160  Elgin  Street,  22nd  Floor,  Ottawa,  ON  K1A  0H3   Tel.:  1-­‐866-­‐582-­‐1884     Fax:  613-­‐957-­‐0941   E-­‐mail:  Shell.Reviews@ceaa-­‐acee.gc.ca       RE:  Public  Comment  by  the  Fort  McMurray  Métis  Local  1935  pertaining  to  Shell  Pierre  River   Mine   (PRM)   Project   Supplemental   Information   Requests:   ERCB   Responses   and   CEAA   and   AESRD   Responses   by   Shell   Canada   for   the   Pierre   River   Mine   Oil   Sands   Mine   Project   Application  and  Environmental  Impact  Assessment  Report.       Dear  Joint  Review  Panel  Secretariat,     Fort  McMurray  Métis  Local  1935  (ML1935)  is  the  association  which  represents  the  interests  of   Métis  people  living  in  Fort  McMurray  and  its  environs.1      The  ML1935  intervenes  with  various   government  agencies  on  behalf  of  members  whose  rights  are  at  risk  of  infringement  as  a  result   of  industrial  development  in  traditional  Métis  territories.  Currently  ML1935  has  approximately   300  active  members  and  ML1935  will  also   represent   the   interests  of  any  Métis  people   in   the   community  whose ...

Attachment From Oil Sands Environmental Coalition (OSEC) to Agency re: Shell Canada's responses to Joint Review Panel's supplemental information requests (see Reference Document Number 191)

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 207
  • Submitted: 2014-01-10
  • From Oil Sands Environmental Coalition (OSEC) to Agency re: Shell Canada's responses to Joint Review Panel's supplemental information requests (see Reference Document Number 191)
  • Attachment included
  • 1 Oil Sands Environmental Coalition Suite 602, 10025-106 Street, Edmonton, AB, T5J 1G4 10 January 2014 Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Attention: Pierre River Mine Joint Review Panel Secretariat 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Re: November 7th invitation for public comments on additional information for the Pierre River Mine Project, CEAA reference number: 59539. Dear Pierre River Mine Review Panel, I am writing to you on behalf of the Oil Sands Environmental Coalition (OSEC) regarding the proposed Shell Canada Pierre River Oil Sands Mine Project (herein referred to as the Project). As stated in our Statement of Concern,1 OSEC has ongoing concerns regarding the Project’s impacts to wildlife, greenhouse gas emissions, air emissions, water issues, and terrestrial impacts. However, there are eight broad areas where the information submitted by Shell Canada does not provide sufficient evidence to stakeholders regarding the mitigation of the Project’s adverse effects: air exceedances, greenhouse gas emissions, economic viability of the project, tailings management, end pit lakes with mature fine tailings, aquatic health and terrestrial and wildlife impacts. OSEC respectfully asks that the Project proponent address the questions provided below. Mitigation of air exceedances Section 3, SIR 5, and Appendix 3.2 Section 5.0 Shell identifies that there are AAAQO exceedances for PM2.5 exceedances at five receptor locations in the base case. Shell indicates that “these exceedances are mainly due to existing and approved projects in the region and there are minimal increases” due to the Project. Shell’s response also identifies that community ...

Attachment From Cynthia Bertolin on behalf of Fort Chipewyan Métis to Panel Manager re: Participation in review proceedings

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 196
  • Submitted: 2013-11-14
  • From Cynthia Bertolin on behalf of Fort Chipewyan Métis to Panel Manager re: Participation in review proceedings
  • Attachment included
  • From: Cynthia Bertolin <email address removed> Sent: November 14, 2013 1:00 PM To: Shell.Reviews [CEAA] Cc: Dunn,Carolyn [CEAA]; 'Jumbo Fraser'; Ora Campbell Subject: Ft Chip Metis (FCM) participation at Shell Pierre River Hearing- are our participation requirements complete Good Morning Ms. Adams Panel Manager Shell Pierre River Carolyn Dunn and I have been communicating. I have embedded some of the email communications as it pertains to FCM question to the Panel. Carolyn has stated that as far as Canada is concerned, FCM are full participants at the Shell Pierre River CEAA process and hearing. See her emails below. From: Dunn,Carolyn [CEAA] [mailto:Carolyn.Dunn@ceaa-acee.gc.ca] Sent: November 13, 2013 1:39 PM To: Cynthia Bertolin Cc: Jumbo Fraser; Ora Campbell Subject: RE: SOC or Objection on Shell Pierre River Hi Cynthia, I’ve sent an e-mail to my participant funding colleagues about the funding. I have no role in what determinations Alberta makes about standing. The Pierre River Panel is a joint review panel and as you have alluded to they don’t use the same tests as Alberta. However, I am not sure what test the Pierre River Panel will be using and I ask that you e-mail the Panel directly to ask them. They can be reached at: Shell.Reviews [CEAA] Shell.Reviews@ceaa-acee.gc.ca and the Panel Manager is Jill Adams. Cheers, Carolyn Crown Consultation Coordinator ______________________________________________________________________________ From: Dunn,Carolyn [CEAA] [mailto:Carolyn.Dunn@ceaa-acee.gc.ca] Sent: November 13, 2013 1:05 PM To: Cynthia Bertolin Cc: Jumbo Fraser; Ora Campbell Subject: RE: SOC or Objection on Shell Pierre River Hi Cynthia, On the ...

Attachment From Shell Canada Limited to Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN) re: Shell's response to ACFN's comments concerning use of ACFN Traditional Knowledge (see Reference Document Number 194)

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 195
  • Submitted: 2013-11-04
  • From Shell Canada Limited to Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN) re: Shell's response to ACFN's comments concerning use of ACFN Traditional Knowledge (see Reference Document Number 194)
  • Attachment included
  • Shell Canada Limited November 4, 2013 Lisa King Director, Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation IRC Dear Ms. King: Re: Shell Canada Limited (Shell) Use of ACFN Traditional Knowledge in Appendix 7.0, Appendix 2.0, and Appendix 3.8 of Shell’s Response to the JRP SIRs for PRM In accordance with ACFN/Shell Traditional Knowledge (TK) sharing agreement which outlines the terms and conditions by which Shell will use ACFN’s TK in Shell’s project development, Shell provided ACFN with the relevant portions of its draft responses to the Pierre River Mine Joint Review Panel (JRP) Supplemental Information Requests (SIRs) on October 2, 2013. Shell received ACFN’s letter entitled Use of ACFN Traditional Knowledge in Appendix 7.0, Appendix 2, and Appendix 3.8 of Shell’s Response to the JRP SIRs for PRM on October 16, 2013. Shell appreciated ACFN’s prompt feedback. We have reviewed and modified, where practical, Appendices 2.0, 3.8 and 7.0 to address ACFN’s comments. Shell’s revisions focused on clarifying references and quotations, clarifying the language used when interpretation from original source material was required, and clarifying ACFN’s traditional territory boundaries considered in the assessment. The updated appendices will be included as part of Shell’s PRM SIR Response to the JRP. As noted in the sharing agreement, ACFN’s concerns may warrant further discussions, and Shell is willing to continue the discussion of these concerns at future consultation sessions. In regards to ACFN’s concerns regarding Shell’s reason for conducting the review of First Nations’ culture, traditional knowledge, and the scope of the review, Shell would like to ...

Attachment From Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN) to Shell Canada Limited re: Use of ACFN Traditional Knowledge in Shell's responses to the Panel's supplementary information requests in Appendix 2.0, Appendix 3.8, and Appendix 7.0 (see Reference Document Number 191)

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 194
  • Submitted: 2013-10-16
  • From Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN) to Shell Canada Limited re: Use of ACFN Traditional Knowledge in Shell's responses to the Panel's supplementary information requests in Appendix 2.0, Appendix 3.8, and Appendix 7.0 (see Reference Document Number 191)
  • Attachment included
  •                       Octob Sandi Team Consu Shell Dear S RE: U 3.8 of ACFN 2013 accura Specif and A Shell approv signifi Shell advers assess sectio of She the PR This i specif (see fo Use E Shell’ expres Enviro that sh            ATH                             ber 16, 2013 Morrisseau Lead, Heav ultation and I Canada Lim Sandi, Use of ACFN f Shell’s Res N has review submission acy of She fically, ACF Appendix 3.8 wishes to re val will like ficant advers – who has se impacts sment activi n.1.3). We s ell’s analysis RM to TLU a is especially fic concerns, for example, Environment s, section. ssly identifie onmental Se hould inform HABASCA                         IN vy Oil Indigenous R mited N Tradition sponse to JR wed certain a to the Join ell’s interpr FN has review . eceive regula ely be more se impacts u a clear inte on ACFN’ ities “from suggest such s and conclu are not cons so when Sh as well as im ACFN’s di tal Setting R 3.5.1.1). In ed by ACFN etting Repor m any Enviro A CHIPEW NDUSTRY R Relations al Knowled RP SIRs for aspects of ad nt Review retation, an wed Append atory approv easily achiev upon ACFN. erest in find s TLU, rig the perspe h assertions g usions, whic idered signif hell’s work e mpact pathw iscussion of Report Upda n addition N in the docu rt, Shell faile onmental Se WYAN FIRS RELATIONS C dge in Appen PRM dvance draft Panel with alysis and dix 7.0, secti val for its pro ved if the Pi At the outs ding that the ghts or cult ective of A go directly to ch predictabl ficant (Appe excludes ma ways that hav this issue in ate at sectio to excludin uments Shel ed to review etting ...

Attachment From Minister of Environment to Acting Chairman of the Energy Resources Control Board (ERCB) re: Coming into force of the Responsible Energy Development Act, the repealing of the ERCB and creation of the Alberta Energy Regulator (see Reference Document Number 186)

  • Pierre River Mine Project
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference number: 187
  • Submitted: 2013-07-04
  • From Minister of Environment to Acting Chairman of the Energy Resources Control Board (ERCB) re: Coming into force of the Responsible Energy Development Act, the repealing of the ERCB and creation of the Alberta Energy Regulator (see Reference Document Number 186)
  • Attachment included
  • Minister of the Environment Ministre de I'Environnement Ottawa, Canada K1 A OH3 JUL 0 4 2013 Mr. Brad McManus Acting Chairman Energy Resources Conservation Board 250 5 Street SW, Suite 1000 Calgary AB T2P OR4 Dear Mr. McManus: Thank you for your letter of June 12, 2013, concerning the coming into force of the Alberta Responsible Energy Development Act (the Act) and the associated implications for the ongoing panel review of the proposed Jackpine Mine Expansion Project. I understand that, as outlined in your letter, under the terms of the Act and its Transition Regulation, the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) will replace the Energy Resources Conservation Board (ERCB) and will assume all of the ERCB's powers, duties and functions under Alberta's energy resource enactments, which includes the Joint Review Panel Agreement (the Agreement) for the proposed project. As a signatory to the Agreement for the proposed project, I agree with the AER assuming the ERCB's position and responsibilities under this agreement, and that the previously appointed members of the Joint Review Panel (the Panel) , Mr. Jim Dilay, Mr. Alex Bolton and Mr. Les Cooke, shall continue to conduct the work of the Panel. I will consider any changes to the Pierre River Mine Project Joint Review Panel Agreement that may be required following the conclusions of the discussions on the recently enacted AER Rules of Practice. The Honourable Peter Kent, P.C., M.P. Canada } l l } -~:~ \~} '\,~ ... . c•"'+ • SmithJ Typewritten Text <original signed by>

Date submitted Display filters

Filters

Date modified: